Category: Political

Current Events, Political

Threats coming home to roost

It appears that Bush administration threats, and their way of doing business, are being exposed by world leaders. The President of Pakistan, in a stunning revelation, discusses Bush administration tactics with the Times.

While Bush’s father used diplomacy (walk softly and all that…) the son never got beyond the stick.

This little snapshot from the pages of the Bush doctrine should serve as notice to everyone in the world, and especially to opponents at home, that we will be crushed to powder if Bush Jr. doesn’t get his way. He might just begin to loose sight of the little barriers that exist in his mind between terrorism and democracy.

If anyone saw Mr. Bush on CNN the previous night you’ll have noticed just how prone he is to anger and threats when he is cornered.

Here are a few excerpts from the Times article on Bush administration threats past and present: We’ll bomb you to Stone Age, US told Pakistan: Musharraf reveals post-9/11 threat in book serialized by The Times

PERVEZ MUSHARRAF, the President of Pakistan, claimed last night that the Bush Administration threatened to bomb his country —into the Stone Age— if it did not co-operate with the US after 9/11, sharply increasing tensions between the US and one of its closest allies in the war on terrorism.

The President, who will meet Mr. Bush in the White House today, said the threat was made by Richard Armitage, then the Deputy Secretary of State, in the days after the terror attacks, and was issued to the Pakistani intelligence director.

—The intelligence director told me that [Armitage] said, ‘Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age’,— President Musharraf said. —I think it was a very rude remark.— The claims come at the end of a week in which relations between the US and Pakistan have sharply deteriorated, and days ahead of the publication of President Musharraf’s memoir, In the Line of Fire, which will be serialised in The Times from Monday.

On Wednesday, President Bush, in an interview with CNN, said that he would not hesitate to authorise immediate American military action inside Pakistan if he had intelligence of Osama bin Laden’s whereabouts. Asked if he would give an order to kill the al-Qaeda leader, Mr Bush said —absolutely—.

President Musharraf was clearly angered by Mr Bush’s declaration that the US would act independently of his authority inside Pakistan…

Current Events, Political

The double standard

It appears that Israel’s foreign minister has firmly told all Palestinians, in a United Nations speech, to make sure they stay out and never attempt to return to their homes.

From Aljazeera: Livni rejects Palestinian right to return:

Tzipi Livni, the Israeli foreign minister, has used a speech at the United Nations to tell Palestinian refugees that they should not expect to be allowed to return to their homes in Israel.

Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were driven out by Israeli forces in the 1948 Middle East war that followed the establishment of Israel and in 1967.

Many Palestinian refugees, the world’s largest refugee population, remain in squalid camps in neighbouring Arab countries. The right of return for them and their descendants has remained a key demand within the peace process…

This is nothing new of course, but I just wonder; if similar demands regarding European property rights and restitution, made by Israelis, or by Jewish people anywhere, were met with this type of response, those giving the response would most likely be called anti-Semitic and would be sued.

Current Events, Media, Perspective, Political

Creeping toward real democracy

Turkey has always claimed to be a secular democracy. However, any real review of Turkish practice would indicate that it is a democracy where some (Muslims) are far more equal than others (Christians and Armenian and Kurdish minorities).

Calling yourself a democracy —“ and secular —“ may work as a disguise for a little while, but the proof is in the way you live out your democracy.

One of the traits of a democracy is the ability of its citizens —“ and anyone else —“ to comment on, criticize, and yes, even ‘insult’ the politics and practices of that democracy. Being ultra-sensitive and ultranationalist go hand-in-hand. They both act to stifle debate. Getting upset about criticism makes you anything but a democracy (by making laws against criticism) or just makes you childish.

Turkish judges seem to be getting that point. Zaman Online reports: Novelist Shafak Acquitted of Insulting Turkishness. Excerpts follow:

Well-known Turkish novelist Elif Shafak has been acquitted in the case against her for allegedly “insulting Turkishness” due to her remarks in her latest novel named “The Bastard of Istanbul”.

The controversial trial of the famous author Shafak commenced this morning at Beyoglu court amid protests from ultranationalists against the European Union (EU).

Beyoglu 2nd Court of First Instance decided on Thursday to acquit Shafak in the case in which she was charged with “insulting Turkishness” due to lack of legal grounds for the crime in question and insufficient evidence.

Turkey’s 35-year old novelist was sued under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, the same law that ensnared Orhan Pamuk, one of Turkey’s best-known contemporary authors, last year.

Late in July, an Istanbul court decided to open a case against author Elif Safak on charges of denigrating Turkishness for remarks made by Armenian characters in her book named “Father and Bastard” in Turkish version, aka “The Bastard of Istanbul.” Shafak faces up to three years imprisonment if found guilty.

Shafak’s book recounts the story of relations between an Armenian family and two Turkish families. An Armenian character in the book says that “Turkish butchers” killed her family and that the deaths were “genocide.”

The ultra-nationalist Turkish Lawyers Association Chairman Kemal Kerincsiz, who is infamous for filing complaints against journalists and authors, was also responsible for opening the case against author Elif Shafak, an assistant professor of Near Eastern studies at the University of Arizona, in the U.S.

The European Union has repeatedly criticized Turkey for its lack of progress on the freedom of expression of writers and journalists. Several writers have been convicted under the notorious Article 301; however, none have been jailed; instead, the courts have tended to hand down fines, the maximum amount being $4,000.

Earlier this year, an Istanbul court dropped a case brought against Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk, also charged with ‘insulting Turkishness’, following remarks he had made concerning the killing of Armenians during the last years of the Ottoman Empire.

In July, Perihan Magden another famous Turkish author and journalist was acquitted in the case against her for discouraging people from performing their military service due to remarks in her column in a Turkish daily.

Political

Is that sulfur I smell?

Chávez Calls Bush ‘the Devil’ in U.N. Speech from the NY Times

President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela bitterly and sarcastically assailed President Bush before the United Nations General Assembly today, portraying Mr. Bush as —the devil— who thinks he is —the owner of the world.—

—Yesterday, the devil came here,— Mr. Chávez said, alluding to Mr. Bush’s appearance before the General Assembly on Tuesday. —Right here. Right here. And it smells of sulfur still today, this table that I am now standing in front of.—

I’m prepared to send the following to Mr. Bush:

Hazardous Materials Class 4.1

It’s the haz-mat sign used for class 4.1 substances, particularly sulfur. I can hear the conversation now, ‘Agent, we’ll need enough for Washington, the cars, and enough for Crawford (the new Palm Springs).’

Unfortunately, Mr. Chávez made a bad character assessment. Remember, the devil is wily… I’m just not seeing the crafty, clever, cunning, and sly part. I’ll give Mr. Bush the devious and scheming though.

Political

For whom the vote tolls

Andrew Cusack enumerates the sins of the Republican Party in Elephant Season Begins November 7:

Voting Republican means we get liberal internationalism at our own expense (in blood, mind you, not just taxes), while at home we get porous borders (despite the terrorist threat), implicitly condoned illegal immigration (it’s good for business!), egregious spending (the ‘compassionate conservatism’ which is neither compassionate nor conservative), and the expansion of the powers of the federal government (continuing and augmenting the flagrant breaches of the Constitution which began in the 1960’s). Such being the case, the real question should be: what kind of self-respecting conservative would support such things with his vote?

I do not agree with abstaining from voting. It really comes down to strategy. Mom always said —“ ‘don’t vote the party line, vote for the best person for the job.’ That’s far better wisdom then engaging in raw partisanship. What mix of politicos will get true conservatives closer to the desired outcome? Who knows, living in NY State gives you a choice between wildly liberal and left leaning centrists. We simply have to vote for those whose weight will balance the mix.

BTW —“ the elephant graphic on his site might get him a visit from Homeland Security —“ you know, we’re protecting our God given leaders protectors freedoms.

Tip ‘o the biretta to the Young Fogey for pointing to this.

Christian Witness, Current Events, Political

Thou shalt not tithe

Today’s Albany Times Union carries an article about a couple who have been forbidden to tithe because they declared bankruptcy.

It appears that the Republican Congress has rewritten the bankruptcy statute in such a way that previous exemptions for religious giving have been removed for most people. The Congress has effectively told their evangelical Christian supporters that their biblical tithing principals mean nothing (ref. Malachi 3:10):

Bring the whole tithe into the storehouse, That there may be food in my house, and try me in this, says the LORD of hosts: Shall I not open for you the floodgates of heaven, to pour down blessing upon you without measure?

All Christians should be cautious of what the world offers (especially when politicians offer it). Our witness is to be to all, and we must witness a faith that supersedes the laws of men.

The excerpts from the story below conclude by noting who was served by your representatives in Congress. They served those who paid them enough to be served —“ the creditor industry. To whom did they pay their tithe? For the full story see: No place for church in state of bankruptcy.

Judge orders debtors to pay bills in rejecting $100 a month for parish

ALBANY — Bankruptcy lawyers around the nation are blasting a revised federal tax statute that pits civil law against the spiritual commitments of the financially strapped faithful.

A federal bankruptcy judge in Albany ruled in late August that the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act forbids debtors from deducting charitable contributions when calculating disposable income.

Judge Robert E. Littlefield Jr. said he had little choice but to reluctantly rule against an Adirondacks couple who sought to fight the new ban in bankruptcy court.

When Frank and Patricia Diagostino filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition, they asked to be allowed to continue making their $100 monthly donation to the Sacred Heart Parish of Massena while they paid off their unsecured debts.

But Littlefield noted in his decision that the reform legislation clearly says such a contribution is not considered a reasonable expense when a family’s income is above the median level.

That means credit card companies and others owed money get first crack at available funds from someone filing for bankruptcy, even if that person has been regularly donating money to a church.

It’s a religious dilemma for those who believe, like the Diagostinos, that tithing a regular percentage of their annual income is a necessary expense.

“Thou shalt have no gods before me … except for MasterCard, Visa and American Express,” said Henry J. Sommer, president of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.

“For religious Americans who find themselves deeply in debt … the reform legislation didn’t just reword the federal bankruptcy code, it also effectively rewrote Exodus and Deuteronomy,” Sommer said.

In his opinion, Littlefield said the change in bankruptcy law “effectively closes the door” to debtors who are above the median income from deducting charitable contributions as an expense, unless they can establish that the contributions fall under the IRS guidelines.

“The court does not agree with this awkward, bifurcated congressional framework which makes charitable giving easier for some debtors and not others,” he said. “Whether tithing is, or is not, reasonable for a debtor in bankruptcy is for Washington to decide. However, consistency and logic would demand the same treatment of all debtors.”

Until Congress amends tax law, “the court’s hands are tied and the tithing principles that this court once applied … have been effectively mooted.”

The whole bankruptcy concept is unusual, Albany Law School Professor Timothy Lytton said. Because it is a privilege that the government extends, “it has the right to define exclusions as it wants.”

What the reform legislation says is, “while the government can’t interfere with your right to practice your religion, you can’t use your religion to get out of your legal obligations,” he said.

The law seems to have pitted the Republican-led Congress into conflict with itself, Lytton added. While the majority of the GOP leans toward the religious right, he said, the statute it enacted now hurts some of the very people those lawmakers seek to protect.

For Jonathan C. Lipson, an associate professor of commercial, corporate and bankruptcy law at Temple University, the current religious exemption conundrum isn’t the only troubling aspect of the contentious statute.

Besides failing to protect those who tithe, nothing was put in place to assist financially struggling soldiers in Iraq or survivors of Hurricane Katrina. Instead, he said, bankruptcy reforms go easier on big business, something he said is indicative of “what you would expect from the agendas of this Congress.”

“There is no end of scorn for how poorly drafted the statute is,” said Lipson, who also is co-chairman of the American Bar Association’s Committee on Business Law Education. “And the credit card companies had the best help available. They spent an enormous amount of money.”

Yep.

Poland - Polish - Polonia, Political

Gwynne Dyer —“ Keeping the red banner waving

The Canadian ‘diplomatic’ journal Embassy which bills itself as Canada’s Foreign Policy Newsweekly published an article entitled Poland’s Terrible Twins by Gwynne Dyer on September 6, 2006.

The article is one of the most bigoted and intellectually absurd things I have ever read.

Embassy describes itself as follows:

International News, Opinions. Features, Culture and Lifestyle

Embassy is an unbiased and authoritative newsweekly focused on international affairs from a distinctively Canadian point of view and on the diplomatic community in Ottawa. Embassy gives its influential and prestigious readers breaking and informed news, society and cultural coverage and policy briefings to help make their work in Canada better informed and more effective.

If the following column represents the Canadian point-of-view I’d be greatly surprised.

[Heavy sarcasm warning]

“I am afraid that with Jaroslaw Kaczynski as prime minister, Poland will become more extreme, more anti-European and a more xenophobic country,” warned Bronislaw Komorowski, a member of the opposition Civic Platform party, when the second Kaczynski twin was made prime minister by his brother, President Lech Kaczynski, in July. He could have added that Poland is becoming more anti-Semitic, more homophobic, and much more vengeful towards former Communists and collaborators.

Right out of the box the author finds a self hating Pole, and a political opponent of the current administration, to set the tone. It does not appear that this is going to be a thoughtful analysis. Oh, and the anti-Semitism thing – don’t forget, all Poles get it with their mother’s milk; although we might have gotten the homophobia thing from the right breast.

The Kaczynski twins, chubby 57-year-olds whose baby faces remind everyone that they first shot to fame as child actors in the 1960s, are identical in both their appearance and their politics. They are nationalist, Catholic, and conservative (as mayor of Warsaw, Lech banned gay parades and called the organizers “perverts”), which is why they appeal to the left-behinds of Polish society, the rural, the poor and the uneducated, who provided most of the votes for their Law and Justice Party last year.

Yes, yes, the stupid Polish Catholic potato pickers are thousands of years behind the rest of civilization. I don’t know (being a Catholic potato picker myself) but I think that a person’s looks have very little to do with their political disposition (I know, the enemy is always ugly). I do know that if one is conservative and Catholic, one ought to stick with the platform they embrace. To do otherwise would make one a hypocrite or a liberal secularist —“ you know, someone without any objective standards. Everything is cool —“ just don’t hurt me.

Then they promised that they would never occupy both of the great offices of state, and Jaroslaw remained as party leader while Lech took the presidency. But the man he appointed as prime minister instead, Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, showed an unexpected streak of independence, so two months ago Lech fired him and appointed Jaroslaw in his place.

Since then, it has gone from bad to worse: Quarrels with Germany, with Russia, with the European Union that Poland joined only two years ago—“and above all, a determined drive to punish everybody who served or helped the Communist regime that collapsed 17 years ago.

The problem being… and this from an alleged historian.

The campaign’s most prominent victim is former president Wojciech Jaruzelski, who declared martial law in 1981 and jailed about 10,000 Solidarity members. Jaruzelski has always claimed that he did it only to forestall a Soviet invasion that would have ended in a national disaster, for the Poles would have fought back, the country would have been devastated, and all possibility of reform would have been lost for decades.

And serial murderers claim they didn’t do it either. And rapists claim it was the woman’s fault.

Most of Soldarity’s former leaders now accept Jaruzelski’s justification for his decision, though they spent years in jail because of it. Former president Lech Walesa, Solidarity’s founder, was publicly reconciled with Jaruzelski last year in a joint television appearance. But Jaruzelski is now charged with being the head of an “organized criminal group which aimed to perpetrate crimes that consisted of the deprivation of freedom by internment,” and at the age of 82 he faces a possible 11years in jail. Hundreds of thousands of other Poles also face reprisals under the new law introduced by the Kaczynskis.

Under the old rules, members of parliament, judges, and top civil servants and security officials were required to state whether they had collaborated with the Communist-era secret police, but they were not automatically banned from those jobs. Under the new law, all persons in “positions of public trust” who were over 17when Solidarity finally brought down the Communists in1989, including diplomats, local officials, school principals, lawyers and journalists, will lose their jobs if they cannot produce a certificate (to be issued by the Institute for National Remembrance) showing that they were not collaborators.

Employers who do not demand certificates from their employees will also lose their jobs. The secret police files of people who held public office under the Communists will be published on the internet, together with the names of all former secret policemen. And of course thousands of individuals will be punished in this way because of false or misleading information in those files.

Similar things happened in other countries of the former Soviet bloc just after the Communist regimes were swept away by the revolutions of 1989, though nothing so extreme. But to institute such a witch-hunt 17 years later, when most of the targets of this revenge are retired or nearing the end of their working lives, is vindictive and pointlessly destructive.

Oh, I see now. Mr. Dyer is shilling for the communists. You know, collective farms, mass starvation, work camps, disappearing family members, gulags, Siberia…

Now imagine if you will that Mr. Dyer is walking the streets of Buenos Aries and runs across Dr. Mengele. I imagine he would bow and say, look you’re old and I don’t want to be vindictive —“ here’s a free pass. No, no, don’t be silly, Gen. Jaruzelski only shot a few Poles, had some stupid Catholic clergy killed, unjustly imprisoned people —“ a small price to pay to keep the red banner waving. Let’s all sing the Internationale and get along…

It is the same resentful obsession with past wrongs that caused President Kaczynski to cancel a visit to Germany recently after a small-circulation German newspaper satirized him as a “potato-head”. It gives rise to demands that Poland erect a memorial to the 1940 massacre at Katyn, in which Soviet troops murdered at least 15,000 Polish reserve officers, directly across the street from the Russian embassy. And it turns a blind eye to anti-Semitism, gay-bashing and other relics from the darker parts of Poland’s past.

The full list of sins defined by secularists can be found at —“ now where is my little red book? Let’s take 15,000 Canadians and shoot them, dumping their remains in mass graves. Oh, and grab a few million more and deport them to death camps in Siberia (well northern Canada at least). I’m sure Canadians won’t mind —“ the Poles certainly shouldn’t mind, at least according to Mr. Dyer. And let’s be sure to stereotype whole societies by the sins of a few. All Canadians are… now where’s that little red book again?

The funny thing is that Mr. Dyer, if he were a Pole in Eastern Poland at the time, would have been one of the first to be shot at Katyn. They weren’t just military officers, they were doctors, lawyers, writers, and intellectuals.

Poland is highly nationalist because it has had a dreadful history of partition, conquest and oppression at the hands of its far bigger neighbours, Germany and Russia. It is the most Catholic country in Europe because its religion was a rallying point during the long decades of foreign occupation. It is socially conservative because almost half its people are still essentially rural. None of that is bad in itself, but the Kaczynskis know how to push all of Poland’s buttons, and they do it shamelessly and relentlessly.

Here Mr. Dyer makes a fleeting attempt to honor his PhD in History. I wonder if he played this fast a loose with the facts in his doctoral dissertation. Maybe his academic advisers were just wowed when he sang Czerwony sztandar (The Red Standard – the hymn of the Polish proletariat) in the original. Doctoral research is tough business.

Two million young Poles—“over five percent of the population—“have left the country for greener pastures in western Europe since EU membership made it easy for them to move. The 17 per cent unemployment rate, the highest in the EU, gave them a big incentive to go, but in many cases that wasn’t all that pushed them out. There is another Poland, but quite a lot of it is currently living abroad.

And Polish immigrants contribute exactly how much toward Canadian society (now checking the little red book)? Anyway, we don’t want those Catholic potato pickers polluting our liberal society – keep ’em home!

Now let me make a few needlessly stupid, uneducated, uncouth, and misleading statements —“ uh, no —“ that would put me at Mr. Dyer’s level.

What I can offer is the English translation for Czerwony Sztandar

The workers’ flag is deepest red,
It shrouded oft our martyred dead;
And ere their limbs grew stiff and cold
Their life-blood dyed its every fold.

Then raise the scarlet standard high;
Within its shade we’ll live and die,
Though cowards flinch and traitors sneer,
We’ll keep the red flag flying here.

Mr. Dyer —“ keeping those red flags dyed a deep red.

Embassy – 69 Sparks St., Ottawa, ON, K1P 5A5 – Tel: (613) 232-2922 Fax: (613) 232-9055

Christian Witness, Political

On the right to work

Father Martin Fox writes on Lifting up the Right to Work lightning rod…

He beings with:

Another Labor Day; another opportunity to offer some clarity about what the rights of working people and the dignity of work entail, but which our laws don’t provide for:

And ends with:

* The logic of the “coercion is for their own good” mentality is, ultimately, hostile to self-government. If workers need to be coerced, why stop there? Why shouldn’t people be coerced into religion, for their own good? Why shouldn’t they be subject to a fascist political system, “for their own good?” Where does it end.

These are some of the reasons I am for Right to Work.

I highly recommend that you check out his posting and the comments attached to it. Fr. Fox is not just blowing smoke; he has the facts to back up his assertions.

As a past victim of union coercion I am in total agreement.

Poland - Polish - Polonia, Political

The Common Man (Do prostego człowieka)

The Common Man
by Julian Tuwim, 1929

When plastered billboards scream with slogans
‘fight for your country, go to battle’
When media’s print assaults your senses,
‘Support our leaders’ shrieks and rattles…
And fools who don’t know any better
Believe the old, eternal lie
That we must march and shoot and kill
Murder, and burn, and bomb, and grill…

When press begins the battle-cry
That nation needs to unify
And for your country you must die…
Dear brainwashed friend, my neighbor dear
Brother from this, or other nation
Know that the cries of anger, fear,
Are nothing but manipulation
by fat-cats, kings who covet riches,
And feed off your sweat and blood – the leeches!
When call to arms engulfs the land
It means that somewhere oil was found,
Shooting ‘blackgold’ from underground!
It means they found a sneaky way
To make more money, grab more gold
But this is not what you are told!

Don’t spill your blood for bucks or oil
Break, burn your rifle, shout: ‘NO DEAL!’
Let the rich scoundrels, kings, and bankers
Send their own children to get killed!
May your loud voice be amplified
By roar of other common men
The battle-weary of all nations:
WE WON’T BE CONNED TO WAR AGAIN!

Here is the original:

Do prostego człowieka

Gdy znów do murów klajstrem świeżym
Przylepiać zaczną obwieszczenia,
Gdy “do ludności”, “do żołnierzy”
Na alarm czarny druk uderzy
I byle drab, i byle szczeniak
W odwieczne kłamstwo ich uwierzy,
Że trzeba iść i z armat walić,
Mordować, grabić, truć i palić;
Gdy zaczną na tysięczną modłę
Ojczyznę szarpać deklinacją
I łudzić kolorowym godłem,
I judzić “historyczną racją”,
O piędzi, chwale i rubieży,
O ojcach, dziadach i sztandarach,
O bohaterach i ofiarach;
Gdy wyjdzie biskup, pastor, rabin
Pobłogosławić twój karabin,
Bo mu sam Pan Bóg szepnął z nieba,
Że za ojczyznę – bić się trzeba;
Kiedy rozścierwi się, rozchami
Wrzask liter pierwszych stron dzienników,
A stado dzikich bab – kwiatami
Obrzucać zacznie “żołnierzyków”. –
– O, przyjacielu nieuczony,
Mój bliźni z tej czy innej ziemi!
Wiedz, że na trwogę biją w dzwony
Króle z pannami brzuchatemi;
Wiedz, że to bujda, granda zwykła,
Gdy ci wołają: “Broń na ramię!”,
Że im gdzieś nafta z ziemi sikła
I obrodziła dolarami;
Że coś im w bankach nie sztymuje,
Że gdzieś zwęszyli kasy pełne
Lub upatrzyły tłuste szuje
Cło jakieś grubsze na bawełnę.
Rżnij karabinem w bruk ulicy!
Twoja jest krew, a ich jest nafta!
I od stolicy do stolicy
Zawołaj broniąc swej krwawicy:
“Bujać – to my, panowie szlachta!”

More information on Tuwim is available from The World of English in Poetry for the Street

Current Events, Perspective, Political

About moral or intellectual confusion

Last night Keith Olbermann of MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann delivered a masterful retort to Donald Rumsfeld’s diatribe against the vast majority of Americans who do not agree with this administration’s pursuit of war.

A transcript of his remarks is available at Crooks and Liars. See Keith Olbermann Delivers One Hell of a Commentary on Rumsfeld where in part he says:

Sadly, we have no Winston Churchills evident among us this evening. We have only Donald Rumsfelds, demonizing disagreement, the way Neville Chamberlain demonized Winston Churchill.

History – and 163 million pounds of Luftwaffe bombs over England – had taught us that all Mr. Chamberlain had was his certainty – and his own confusion. A confusion that suggested that the office can not only make the man, but that the office can also make the facts.

You can also view his comments in a better format at TMP Café in Olberman Our New Murrow.

What shocked me about Rumsfeld’s speech was the following (from a transcript of his remarks at Stars and Stripes):

And in every army, there are occasional bad actors, the ones who dominate the headlines today, who don’t live up to the standards of the oath and of our country. But you also know that they are a very, very small percentage of the literally hundreds of thousands of honorable men and women in all theaters in this struggle who are serving our country with humanity, with decency, with professionalism, and with courage in the face of continuous provocation.

And that is important in any long struggle or long war, where any kind of moral or intellectual confusion about who and what is right or wrong, can weaken the ability of free societies to persevere.

So Mr. Rumsfeld is stating that former military leaders and servicepeople who have come out against this war are traitors to their oath and to their country? Wow!!! I wonder what he thinks of his boss when he uses the Constitution as toilet paper.

Mr. Rumsfeld then he goes on to call the rest of us morally and intellectually confused? Cool, because if we were we wouldn’t see, nor would we care about, the loss of our freedoms and the high cost of our misadventures.

WSJV in Bush Sounds Off Against War Critics reports that President Bush’s speech in front of the American Legion’s national convention included the following:

The president said years of pursuing stability in the Middle East was proven a mirage after Sept. 11, 2001. Now, only a nation that commits itself to freedom can help itself and the rest of the world to defeat terror.

I take it that means that those who have pursued peace are idiots and that peace can only be obtained at the end of a gun?

Who knew? Now that I am aware of my moral and intellectual ineptitude, as well as the fact that I am an idiot, I can go out and buy some guns and give peace a chance.

For my part I will pray that our dear Lord grant the light of wisdom to our leaders. I will pray that their moral and intellectual darkness be eliminated, and that they see the truth. I will pray that they cease calling evil good and good evil and that they see that war is not peace.

God have mercy on us all.