Category: Political

Current Events, Political

Hevesi saga unfolding

As regular readers may note, I’ve commented on the unfolding drama surrounding NYS Controller Alan Hevesi (search my blog for more) and his ‘taking adavantage of my position’ shortcuts. Fred Dicker of the NY post is reporting that the Controller (an elected official) has put a non-elected official in charge of his office while he battens down the hatches. Time to lawyer-up Mr. Hevesi. See: Hevesi Yields Power, Puts Pal In Charge an excerpt from which follows:

SCANDAL-scarred state Comptroller Alan Hevesi has turned control of his office over to his longtime political consultant, Hank Morris, in hopes of staving off a criminal indictment, The Post has learned.

High-level Democratic officials, including operatives close to Hevesi – who is under criminal investigation by at least two agencies for providing a state-funded chauffeur to his wife for 31/2 years – said Morris is now the de-facto chief of one of the state’s most powerful offices.

“Hank Morris has taken over for Hevesi,” said a key player in the statewide Democratic election campaigns.

“Longtime government aides have been pushed aside as Morris calls all the shots” on what the huge comptroller’s office – which serves as the state’s top auditor – is able to do, the source continued…

How nice – the democracy of one at work. As a citizen I somehow feel underserved…

Christian Witness, Current Events, Perspective, Political

The end is near – again

In a comment on an article by Chris Hedges: Bush’s Nuclear Apocalypse, a reader named Mason states:

…I am absolutely horrified about what’s going to happen and with the GOP now unravelling behind Predatorgate such that the Dems have a legitimate shot of winning control of at least one house in Congress, I realize that any reservations that King George entertained about nuking Iran have evaporated because, in what passes for his mind, he cannot allow the elections to take place. A Democratic majority means subpoenas, hearings, and impeachment by inches.

God, how I wish it were not so, but I think we’re looking at nuclear war in fifteen days followed by cancelled elections and dissenting citizens being rounded up and disappeared into gulags, never to be seen or heard from again.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m terrified and I don’t scare easily. I think that the only hope we’ve got is if someone wearing a ton of brass marches into the White House and takes the car keys away from the madman whose foreign policy is dictated by a disembodied voice in his head that he calls God.

I would agree with some of the article’s commentators, in that the scenario would seem overly apocalyptic. I also think that some of the information on the reasons for deploying aircraft carrier battle groups to the Persian Gulf is too lightly researched (what about regular rotations, the beefing up of the U.S. military presence in a final attempt to get Bagdad under control, etc.). And what do you mean – they won’t let us blog from the gulag ;)?

I work with a lot of reservists. If they start disappearing without notice then I’ll be getting very nervous.

All in all I am nervous. Mr. Bush looks like he’s less and less in control of his faculties. He is manufacturing stories that have no relationship to reality. He’s combative and defensive in interpersonal contact. It’s not a stretch to think of what he might do; the story by Mr. Hedges being a possibility.

If Mr. Bush finally attempts to, or takes a step over the cliff-of-no-return, what are the possible choices for those who could do something?

  • If I were Congress I’d be moving for impeachment. As a matter of fact, do it now, even with a weak case —“ it could distract him long enough. This is the best scenario as it falls in line with our democratic principals.
  • If I were the military I’d be preparing to do a Thailand type coup. This would be among the worst scenarios, but I think people would buy it if there was a looming danger. It’s also classic Rome revisited —“ history repeating itself. ‘Oh Caesar, save us!’ It’s just that Caesar won’t go away.
  • If I were the Russians and the Chinese I’d be pointing my ICBM’s right back at the U.S. They might be able to shut Mr. Bush up with one call on the ‘red phone’. They could care for our government or people, but they do have to protect their self interests. This may or may not work. In Mr. Bush’s own mind he’d probably figure that he could speed the second coming through MAD.

When you have a madman running a superpower you pretty much assure that everyone else will be looking to anyone that makes more sense (and that’s pretty much everyone else right now). Can you see China or re-emergent Russia steering the ship?

As Christians we are to be a eschatological people. We pray the Our Father – ‘Thy Kingdom come’ but in praying for the coming of the Kingdom we follow by praying ‘Thy Will be done’. Acknowledging God’s will is supposed to be an act of submission. Somehow, those of Mr. Bush’s ilk have decided that they can forego submission and tell God what to do.

Remember, the Kingdom is here but not yet, and only the Father knows. Focus your attention and energy on living within God’s parameters and maybe then you would speed the coming of the Kingdom.

Christian Witness, Current Events, Media, Political

Church and State

The NY Times is doing a four part series called —In God’s Name—. It highlights the exemptions and benefits religious organizations get from the government.

The first two articles are now on-line:

I encourage you to give them a read (they are long).

Besides the false extrapolation of those in the religious community who act uncharitably (e.g., those who turned a nun out because she had breast cancer) to the entire faith community, the articles do beg the question —“ When will the piper come for his pay?

The faith community needs to take charge of the paradigm and refocus itself on matters of faith, not business (although doing business rightly is not a wrong in and of itself —“ business must be connected to and must flow from the central purpose of the organization).

Current Events, Perspective, Poland - Polish - Polonia, Political

Shut-up, shut-up, shut-up!!!

The Washington post reports on an academic who was to deliver a lecture at the Polish Consulate in New York City.

In: In N.Y., Sparks Fly Over Israel Criticism, Polish Consulate Says Jewish Groups Called To Oppose Historian the Post describes the last minute cancellation of a lecture by Tony Judt. The Polish Consul General, Krzysztof Kasprzyk, caved to pressure from the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee who do not agree with Mr. Judt.

Mr. Judt and other academics who espouse any thinking contrary to the sanctified image of the Jewish State and the United States’ multi-billion dollar support of that state have faced blistering attacks and cancellations of their lectures.

Personally, as a Polish American, I am ashamed of Mr. Kasprzyk.

The beauty of Poland was that it was once, and still is, a country that welcomes all (including, historically, millions upon millions of Jews who sought and received freedom there). Poland’s history as a nation is all the richer from the learning, growth, and development that occurred there based on a free exchange of ideas between peoples and cultures (much as the United States has).

The roots of today’s Jewish State go back to the social and political developments that took place within the Jewish community in Poland. Unfortunately, the connection between free speech and free development seems to be lost on people who would rather hold on to their tenuous grasp of what is today.

Groups like the ADL and the AJC have done a fantastic job of placing themselves in a position of influence. I actually credit their ingenuity and hard work.

I would just encourage people to peek under the covers and ask themselves if they like everything they see.

As to Mr. Kasprzyk, perhaps he likes being an errand boy. To him I would simply say —“ Iść i łudzić się (Go and deceive yourself). Perhaps you think that the ADL and AJC will stop labeling all Poles as anti-Semites, or that Poland will get a big fat thank you? Good luck! You should have learned in the school of hard knocks diplomacy that the convenience of today will be the downfall of tomorrow. I hope you are recalled from your post.

A few excerpts from the Post article with my commentary interspersed:

NEW YORK — Two major American Jewish organizations helped block a prominent New York University historian from speaking at the Polish consulate here last week, saying the academic was too critical of Israel and American Jewry.

The historian, Tony Judt, is Jewish and directs New York University’s Remarque Institute, which promotes the study of Europe. Judt was scheduled to talk Oct. 4 to a nonprofit organization that rents space from the consulate. Judt’s subject was the Israel lobby in the United States, and he planned to argue that this lobby has often stifled honest debate.

And… here’s the irony and the self fulfilling prophesy come to realization.

An hour before Judt was to arrive, the Polish Consul General Krzysztof Kasprzyk canceled the talk. He said the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee had called and he quickly concluded Judt was too controversial.

“The phone calls were very elegant but may be interpreted as exercising a delicate pressure,” Kasprzyk said. “That’s obvious — we are adults and our IQs are high enough to understand that.”

Mr. Kasprzyk has bought into natavist stereotypes. He is defending his IQ, not freedom of speech.

Judt, who was born and raised in England and lost much of his family in the Holocaust, took strong exception to the cancellation of his speech. He noted that he was forced to cancel another speech later this month at Manhattan College in the Bronx after a different Jewish group had complained. Other prominent academics have described encountering such problems, in some cases more severe, stretching over the past three decades.

The pattern, Judt says, is unmistakable and chilling.

“This is serious and frightening, and only in America — not in Israel — is this a problem,” he said. “These are Jewish organizations that believe they should keep people who disagree with them on the Middle East away from anyone who might listen.”

The leaders of the Jewish organizations denied asking the consulate to block Judt’s speech and accused the professor of retailing “wild conspiracy theories” about their roles. But they applauded the consulate for rescinding Judt’s invitation.

In diplomacy what goes unsaid often speaks louder than what is said. It is also what terrorists do; they create an atmosphere of fear. They needn’t say anything, everyone knows what …might… happen.

“I think they made the right decision,” said Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League. “He’s taken the position that Israel shouldn’t exist. That puts him on our radar.”

David A. Harris, executive director of the American Jewish Congress, took a similar view. “I never asked for a particular action; I was calling as a friend of Poland,” Harris said. “The message of that evening was going to be entirely contrary to the entire spirit of Polish foreign policy.”

If you weren’t asking for anything why call —“ to chat up the weather? Oh, and thank you for your affirmation of yet another country’s foreign policy. If it weren’t for your take on foreign policy the world might fall apart —“ but then again —“ it is…

Judt has crossed rhetorical swords with the Jewish organizations on two key issues. Over the past few years he has written essays in the New York Review of Books, the London Review of Books and in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz arguing that power in Israel has shifted to religious fundamentalists and territorial zealots, that woven into Zionism is a view of the Arab as the irreconcilable enemy, and that Israel might not survive as a communal Jewish state.

The solution, he argues, lies in a slow and tortuous walk toward a binational and secular state.

Foxman has referred to Judt’s views of Israel as “an offensive caricature.”

And we all know what offensive caricatures did to the Danes.

Thank you to Daithí­ Mac Lochlainn for Historian’s Voice Silenced which pointed to this and to the Young Fogey’s Conservsative Blog for Peace for the pointer to Mr. Mac Lochlainn’s article.

Perspective, Political

Support the Troops

…I support bringing the troops home —“ today, not tomorrow or next week or next month —“ right now. I support providing the troops with gainful employment. I support allowing the troops to be conscientious objectors —“ the more the better. I support allowing the troops to leave the military —“ in droves. I support giving the troops medical treatment for their injuries. I support giving the troops mental help for emotional problems related to being in combat.

And when they are all home —“ from Iraq and everywhere else in the world —“ I support using the troops to actually patrol our coasts and guard our borders. I support the troops so much that I don’t want them sent to fight any more foreign wars.

Support the troops!

From Supporting the Troops by Laurence M. Vance as noted in A Conservative Blog for Peace.

I can’t say I agree 100% with global disengagement but the idiocy of our misadventures over the past two decades brings my thinking more in line with Mr. Vance’s.

We are like the husband in a bad relationship. We think we can provide all the answers and solutions to every problem, but we end up mucking it up all the more.

Christian Witness, Current Events, Perspective, Political

Foley folly, but by golly we’ll win

Just a few questions:

  • Why is the first, and pretty much only question, the affect this scandal will have on the November elections?
  • Why is the second question whether this guy is lying about his alcoholism and prior contacts with deviant clergy?
  • Why is the third question the affect of the scandal on the homosexual community?

Shouldn’t the first, second, third, and fourth question concern the welfare of these young men who have been victimized?

For some reason people assume that if you’re sixteen years old and male you can’t be abused or victimized (by either sex). It’s part of the dichotomy between excessive Victorian guilt over sexuality and living in a society where everyone is expected to engage in sexual behaviors as early and as often as possible.

  • That boy and the hot teacher —“ ‘Oh, oh, oh, wish it was me.’
  • ‘Mom, dad, how should I respond if someone comes on to me? — Oh son, lets not talk about it, its dirty.’

It seems to me that Catholic Christianity has a lot to say about the proper ordering of sexual celebration within marriage and the relationship between healthy desire, pleasure, and commitment (what everyone wants —“ but no one will say, and what all parents should discuss with their children).

And if you don’t think that this person’s lechery and disjointed personality have had an affect on these young men, forcing them to question their sexuality at an age where everything is appearances, and forcing them to loose what little faith they have in the pillars of society, while they still have some modicum of faith in the ‘establishment’, you are deluding yourself.

Current Events, Political

Ooops he did it again

From the public employees as errand boys file.

The Albany Times Union editorializes on State Controller (the person who’s job it is to assure us that public funds are used properly) Alan Hevesi’s latest misuse of public employees in Mr. Hevesi, again:

No one is suggesting this election season that New York Comptroller Alan Hevesi lacks the specialized skills to perform one of the more critical jobs in state government. The questions instead are simple enough to be of the layman’s variety. For example, where is this man’s common sense?

Last week should have had Mr. Hevesi especially on guard. It began with him having to repay the state some $83,000 after he was caught using a comptroller’s office employee to act as a driver for his ailing wife. Only by week’s end, Mr. Hevesi was scrambling to resolve another embarrassing misuse of the public’s money that never should have occurred in the first place.

Both Mr. Hevesi and his suddenly more aggressive and viable challenger, Christopher Callaghan, spoke to a New York State Association of Counties conference in Lake George. When it was Mr. Callaghan’s turn, Mr. Hevesi had him tape-recorded.

That much has become rather routine in political campaigns, a reality driven home by U.S. Sen. George Allen of Virginia and his already infamous “Macaca” comment. Such work is usually done by campaign aides. In Mr. Hevesi’s case, though, it was one of the press aides from the comptroller’s office, as the New York Daily News reported…

Current Events, Political

A question

Based on Hugo Chavez’ insults directed at President Bush, do you think that one of Mr. Bush’s children (or his brother) will run for President so as to avenge the insults against the Bush family?

Think of it, the U.S. invades Venezuela to overthrow the mean Mr. Chavez (oh yeah, and the oil thing all over again).

You’re welcome to discuss in the land of nightmares.