Day: November 10, 2010

Everything Else, Perspective, Poland - Polish - Polonia

Children of the rich

After reading the story I will point to below, my sarcasm meter went off the scale. I’ve long held that the rich, those who made their own wealth through enterprise are occasionally faced with a child or children who, if left to run the business would destroy it in a matter of minutes. As such, the rich are faced with a challenge in determining some future for their less than adequate (in a business sense) children. Where do these children end up? Typically politics. George W. Bush was a prime example – failed in every business he touched from oil wells to baseball, soft landing in politics. Looking at the pedigree of certain politicians, well, you know why they are there – let them screw up the government, just keep ’em away from the family business.

It appears that another alternative for these children is the arts.

If you have some modicum of common sense, looking at the pictures below might give a clue as to who one might consider trusting:

Trustworthy business people with insight into international intrigue?
Polish Priests and members of Opus Dei seeking to rule the world?

…but, a scion of the rich?

Hi, I'm Roger. Which did I choose? -- Photo via Roger Davidson Music

From the Gothamist and Interia: Laptop Repair Leads To $6 Million Scam Involving Opus Dei, More

If a 58-year-old pianist, whose family founded a huge oilfield services company, is worried about his laptop being infected with a computer virus, why not grift him for $6 million by telling him that not only was the laptop infected, but that he needed physical protection from the worm’s creators based in Honduras and that ” Polish priests affiliated with Opus Dei were attempting to possibly harm” him? That’s what computer repairman Vickram Bedi and Helga Invarsdottir are accused of doing to victim Roger Davidson.

Back in 2004, Davidson went to Bedi’s Mount Kisco, NY repair shop, Datalink, because he was worried music composition on the laptop would be lost. The Westchester DA’s press release about the alleged crime is kind of amazing, so here it is:

The scheme commenced in August 2004, when the victim’s computer developed a virus. Concerned that documents, photos and more importantly the music he had written and had stored on the computer could be lost, the victim took the computer to the defendant’s premises to have it repaired. Bedi confirmed that victim’s computer had a virus and indicated that the virus was extremely virulent and had also damaged Datalink’s computers.

Bedi told the victim that he had the facility, the contacts, and the means of tracking down the source of this virus that specifically targeted the victim’s computer and that he and his family were in grave danger. As a result, Bedi convinced the victim to not only begin paying for computer data retrieval and security, but also to begin paying for necessary personal physical protection.

Bedi subsequently advised the victim that he successfully tracked the source of the computer virus to a remote village in Honduras. Bedi informed him that the hard drive was the source of the worm that had invaded the computer and advised the victim that Bedi’s uncle, who Bedi contended is an officer in the Indian military, flew to Honduras in an Indian military aircraft during a reconnaissance mission and obtained the hard drive.

Bedi further related that his uncle obtained information that Polish priests affiliated with Opus Dei were attempting to possibly harm the victim.

Bedi also advised the victim that the Central Intelligence Agency had subcontracted with Bedi to perform work which would prevent any attempts by the Polish priests associated with Opus Dei to infiltrate the U.S. government.

Over this period Datalink charged the victim’s American Express card accounts on a continuing and monthly basis, resulting of a larceny of more than six million dollars.

It’s possible that the pair may have scammed Davidson, whose great-grandfather and great-grand uncle founded Schlumberger Ltd., for $20 million. Harrison police uncovered the scam when investigating a separate complaint against Bedi. Bedi and Invarsdottir were charged with grand larceny and their bail was set at $5 million bond over $3 million cash each. The pair also had to give up their passports.

Westchester DA Janet DiFiore said, “As is charged in the complaint, these two defendants preyed upon, duped and exploited the fears of this victim with cold calculation and callousness. The systematic method with which they continued the larceny over a period of more than six years is nothing short of heartless.”

I think they could have told him that an invading Martian army had infected his computer, or perhaps it was the Jews. The sorry fact is that people are indeed dumb enough to read Dan Brown and other fiction and draw real life conclusions from it. They believe in every conspiracy flight of fancy from Nostradamus, to Masonic, Bilderberg, and Trilateral Commission plots. There is a scary cleric around every corner just waiting for a piano player with some “very important world shattering sheet music.” Why isn’t he running for office?

Of course there is the unsaid: Where did Mr. Davidson learn (from mom, dad, grandpa?) that Polacks and Catholics can never be trusted. Does he have a load of bigotry that feeds his fears?

By the way, the Star Trek tie is the worst thing I’ve ever seen. Maybe the Vulcans will beam him up to save him from the Polacks?


More info from Pressan – the Icelandic Press:

Helga Invarsdottir’s father claims that Mr. Davidson was having an affair with her, even though he is/was married. Ms. Invarsdottir and Mr. Bedi sat on the “board” of Mr. Davidson’s Society for Universal Sacred Music, Inc. It appears that she was its Treasurer.

Christian Witness, Perspective, , ,

Conversions?

I have been following news of the new Ordinates for Catholics of the Anglican tradition mainly through my reading of articles and links the Young Fogey has posted. I wish these folks well in finding a new home, as I did in the PNCC. I wasn’t fleeing wholesale theological and patristic anarchy as they are, but rather a general weakness in Roman Catholic practice which was a disconnect from all I had learned and knew. It began as an escape, but in the time that passed I realized it had to be a re-evaluation of all I held; it had to be a process of re-education and becoming. That was necessary in order for me to be true to my choice and conscience. I needed to be honest, not just comfortable, rendering more than lip service (Matthew 15:8) to God and the Church. I faced struggles in adapting and in becoming PNCC, and I have to keep old habits and ways of thinking in check to this day.

That said, I offer a few things to consider. I know that the men (AKA bishops) leaving the Anglican Church could care less about my perspective, but here it is:

  • It is a conversion. You will not be who you were, nor will you be able, of good conscience, to believe what you believed or practice what you practiced. You will be able to preserve aspects of your patrimony in liturgies and the cycle of prayer, but even they will change. Do you have it in your heart and mind to accept, defend, and teach all that the Roman Catholic Church teaches? Can you work toward that in good faith and be willing to meet the day when you have to admit that what you were was a falsehood? It will take some time to integrate these things into who you are, but you should really be going in as more than just Anglicans getting rid of women bishops. You cannot resign yourselves to being the Anglican version of “Orthodox in Communion with Rome,” accepting and rejecting teaching as you feel is right. You will trip over this stuff almost every day for the rest of your life — a lot in the beginning.
  • The PNCC experience with many Anglicans has not been good. They rarely make it in the door because they freely admit they want to be Anglican in all ways, but with valid bishops and orders (of course we will not accept those who do not intend to be PNCC). Of those who do convert, many typically revert because we are simply too Catholic for their taste, or they miss home. Learn from those experiences and avoid the pitfall of tying to justify being in a happy place with few “window dressing” concessions. There is no via media. Cognitive dissonance won’t do you or the R.C. Church any good.
  • Can you back the Bishop of Rome as more than that, as your Pope, with full teaching authority and universal jurisdiction, so that when he says, ‘pray it this way,’ you do it that way personal objections notwithstanding? Can you be the new More or Fisher?
  • Can you see past smells, bells, pretty architecture, vestments and the like (externals) to the struggles you will face in the very small communities you will administer, who cannot pay for much, who will similarly struggle against their inbred Protestant ‘I’ll be the judge of that’ way of thinking? They may only be able to afford crappy polyester vestments… what then?
  • Can you get along with the local R.C. Bishop and Diocesan administration who will act more the pope than the pope, pushing you to prove your loyalty by throwing up obstacles and questions every step of the way? You may appear more Catholic than they externally, but they know the system from the inside, and in the R.C. Church the system and its laws can crush you.
  • What do you do when half of those you lead to Rome run back because the trials and work are more than they bargained for? Can you bless them and wish them well in their path to Christ, or will you crucify them as traitors to the cause?
  • Can you bear criticism when you cannot marry a parishioner’s half atheist daughter who hasn’t been to church since she was 14, or cannot baptize her child, or when you cannot give someone an annulment for their 3rd serial marriage, or when you cannot commune some in the congregation? How do you explain all those thorny issues after the glamor of venturing out wears off and reality hits home (pickup Monty Python condom sketch). Can you accept pastoring by Canon Law and the Catechism?
  • You will need to reflect on your choice of staying for as long as you did, accepting unheard-of innovations while holding your nose. People will call you on that. That acceptance will be used against you by R.C. innovators who will point to your acceptance as proof it can be done (as long as the innovations don’t touch you personally). It will also be used against you by ultra-traditionalists who will ask why women bishops became the final straw. Where were your guts when…

There are well wishers, but perhaps they too should be circumspect, looking beyond the initial rush and hype to the reality that awaits. Are you willing to really change? Seek God’s grace — with that and lots of humility and suffering it is possible. It will be interesting to see.