Day: February 11, 2010

Perspective, ,

Some people have a lot of class, and they deserve thanks

My son now has orthodontia. One of the keys to successful treatment is really good oral hygiene. His orthodontist, Dr. Michael Parker (I’d very highly recommend him to anyone in the Albany area) suggested that for flossing he use a new product called the Platypus flosser. These are similar to flossers you can find in a drugstore etc, but they are molded differently so as to fit under the orthodontia. It is really quite inventive and easy to use.

In any event, the doctor gave us a sample and a website for ordering. The Platypus is not available in retail stores. I went on-line to order and… well… I could say pricy, but that would be an understatement. A bag of 25 is $13.95. That’s $0.558 per flossing experience.

Being the good dad, and wanting success for my son, I proceeded to order the flossers, taking advantage of a ‘two free bags when you order ten’ offer. That brought the per unit price down a little. In the midst of ordering I did become a bit incensed at the price and let the company know in the order for comment box. My statement basically indicated that they were overpriced for a piece of moulded plastic, that I didn’t like the price, and that I was ordering because there were no alternatives.

The shipment came today. Included therein was a 10% off coupon for my next order, and here’s the classy part, a personal note from Jessie Sturgis, their Marketing Coordinator. Needless to say, it was a very kind note, expressed understanding of my position, and indicated a commitment to lower prices once production picks up and they enter the retail market.

Ms. Sturgis, thank you for the time you took to speak to a customer and to understand the customer’s point-of-view. With that sort of class your company will go far.

PNCC

Fr. Calvo on the Solemnity of the Presentation

From Fr. Randolpf Calvo of Holy Name Parish in Deerfield, CT: Is There Something More to the Feast of the Presentation?

This liturgical observance is based on Luke 2:22-23. Luke is a Gentile author and his record of the Jewish rites associated with the birth of Jesus are somewhat muddled. These are not customs Luke is personally familiar with as he writes his Gospel. This is clear in the conflation of the presentation of Jesus account, which should have occurred one month after His birth (Numbers 18:16), with that of Mary’s purification on the 40th day after giving birth to a male child (Leviticus 12:2-4), which is the basis of Luke 2:24, and which is also the basis of much of the confusion associated with this account. Even so, they are reported more for theological purpose than historical, and in this they become more profound in what they convey. We are not seeing what happened, but we glimpse why it happened.

For example, when the angel Gabriel announces to Mary that she will be the mother of Jesus, —the Son of the Most High,— (Luke 1:32) she is at first confused by the pronouncement, but then in faith responds, —‘Let it be with me according to your word.’— (Luke 1:38) Mary then gives beautiful expression to her feelings in what the church has come to refer to as the Magnificat. This passage is found in your Bibles at Luke 1:46-55. If you go to your Bibles, you may find there a footnote directing you to 1 Samuel 2:1-10. It is very possible that Mary gave expression to her wonderment and glorified God because of all the events we associate with the Annunciation, but that she expressed them in words so similar to those of Hannah in similar circumstance is more likely for theological purpose than for historical record.

Luke has reached back into the Holy Scriptures of his day to help give expression to the mystery of God’s dramatic role in the birth of Jesus. Hannah was barren and her son Samuel was born only through the intervention of God. In response to Samuel’s miraculous birth, Hannah offers her prayer of joyous praise. When Luke imitates unabashedly these words in the Magnificat, his intention is to connect the two events in the mind of the reader. Anyone familiar with the Holy Scriptures would have realized immediately the connection between the two and that the actual words were not meant to be historically accurate. They were meant to be theologically profound.

Luke continues this theme from the Annunciation to that of Jesus’ presentation at the Temple, which has its parallel when Hannah presents her son Samuel at the Lord’s sanctuary at Shiloh (1 Samuel 1:21-28). Hannah fulfills her promise to God. The young child Samuel is presented at the sanctuary with the mother’s words: —‘I have lent him to the Lord; as long as he lives, he is given to the Lord.’— (1 Samuel 1:28) This prepares Luke’s readers to think of Jesus in the same way, as one whose life is given over completely to God.

Still with Jesus’ presentation in mind, at Luke 2:23 the Evangelist refers to the Mosaic Law of the firstborn male child. According to Exodus 13:2,15 and Numbers 18:15-16, such a child would be redeemed by a payment of five sanctuary shekels. Luke makes no mention of this payment. Instead, he tells the story of the presentation at the Temple, a custom about which absolutely nothing is mentioned in the Old Testament. Since Luke makes reference to the tradition of the redemption of the firstborn male at Luke 2:23, he would also have known about the monetary equivalent. When Luke instead speaks of the presentation, it is because Jesus is already at birth —the Son of the Most High.— Jesus need not be redeemed by the sanctuary shekels because He already belongs to God, He already is God.

Luke’s account of Jesus’ presentation speaks amply of Jesus’ coming life of dedicated service to God and as God’s Son. The historical record of this event is confounded in Luke’s account, but its truth remains unambiguous. The story is not imaginary. It is most likely based on an actual remembrance that Jesus’ family performed the standard Jewish rituals following the birth of a child, but neither is its purpose to merely record history. There is something more. Its truth is in its purpose and meaning. This is why it is gospel-proclamation, and this is its real literal truth.

Perspective, Political, , ,

IWJ sponsors Public Policy Training

Save the Date for Interfaith Worker Justice’s Public Policy Training!
March 14th-16th – Chicago

Learn from experts on the IWJ national staff and local organizational leaders. The trainers bring extensive experience in interfaith organizing, worker and union campaigns, and organizational development.

This Training is designed for:

  • Organizers with faith-based organizations or workers centers
  • Board members, leaders, or volunteers of interfaith organizations
  • Religious or community outreach staff of unions

Sessions covering…

  • How you can be involved in moving federal, state, and local legislation?
  • How to engage in multi-racial alliance building around policy issues?
  • How to engage labor and religious leaders in your policy goals?
  • The current status of Immigration, Jobs, and Wage Theft campaigns and legislation?

IWJ National Office
1020 W Bryn Mawr, 4th floor
Chicago, IL 60660

More information on registration and costs is available at the IWJ website.