Month: March 2009

Christian Witness, Current Events, Poland - Polish - Polonia, , ,

Exhibitions at the Tate

From ArtDaily: Miroslaw Balka to Undertake Next Commission in The Unilever Series at Tate Modern

LONDON.- Tate and Unilever announced that the Polish artist Miroslaw Balka will undertake the tenth commission in The Unilever Series for the Turbine Hall at Tate Modern (13 October 2009 —“ 5 April 2010).

Born in Warsaw, Poland in 1958, Balka lives and works in Warsaw and Otwock. This will be the artist’s first public commission in the UK, which will be unveiled on Monday 12 October 2009. Miroslaw Balka is one of the most significant contemporary artists of his generation. His work has had critical acclaim both in this country and internationally. Comprising installation, sculpture and video, Balka’s works explore themes of personal history and common experience drawing on his Catholic upbringing and the fractured history of his native country, Poland. Intimate and self-reflective, his works demonstrate his central concerns of identifying personal memory within the context of historical memory.

In works such as Oasis (C.D.F.) (1989), he suggests a domestic setting in which the daily rituals of human existence are played out. Eating and sleeping, love and death are evoked using materials which have a particular resonance for Balka such as milk, wooden planks from his childhood home and pine needles salvaged from the tree that grew outside his window. In this work dedicated to the German Romantic painter Caspar David Friedrich, Balka invokes both the spiritual and the everyday.

Central to Balka’s work is the use of materials of humble quality such as ash, felt, soap, salt and hair to give a sense of spirituality through their association with lives lived and memories left behind. Salt, for example, alludes to human emotions in the form of sweat or tears, whilst soap evokes the intimate yet universal daily rituals of cleansing as explored in Hanging Soap Women (2000), in which used bars of soap donated by women are strung together on a wire. In the installation, 190 x 90 x 4973 (2008), Balka constructs a wooden walkway with walls measuring 190cm high (the artist’s height) without any ceiling and made from simple common building materials such as plywood, creating a claustrophobic tunnel with no visible destination.

Memorials play an important role in Polish society but also in Balka’s personal experience —“ his grandfather was a monumental stonemason and his father an engraver of tombstones. His early performances and sculpture referred to his experience of the rituals of Catholicism, perhaps made more intense in a country where religion was repressed…

I would love to see this. If we reflect on this work we see the underlying Catholic connection – the communion of saints, the Church triumphant. It is our connection, raw and closest to the heart, seen through eyes of faith, made beautiful.

For more information visit the Tate

Also from the Tate: Symbolism in Poland and Britain from 14 March to 21 June, 2009.

Perspective, Poland - Polish - Polonia,

…and Polish priests don’t like it either

From CathNews: Polish priests want to marry

Most Polish priests favour an end to celibacy and twelve percent say they are already in a relationship with a woman, a survey has found.

The research has dealt a blow to the country’s reputation as a champion of traditional Catholic values, the UK Telegraph reports.

A survey of over 800 priests carried out by Professor Josef Baniak, a sociologist specialising in religious affairs, found that 53 percent would like to have a wife, while 12 percent admitted that they were involved in a relationship. A further 30 percent said that they had had a sexual relationship with a woman.

Professor Baniak concluded from earlier research that the desire to have a relationship and a family was one of the key reasons for priests leaving the priesthood.

His latest research echoes an earlier survey carried out by the Tygodnik Powszechny newspaper. The conservative publication, aimed at Catholic intellectuals, found that as many as 60 percent of priests wanted the right to marry.

Professor Baniak’s survey, however, has come under fire from the Church. Bishop Wojciech Polak, chairman of the Church’s Vocations Council, described it as “full of generalisations”, adding that he found the “conclusions hard to agree with.”

Bishop Polak must not have access to the books and records as the auxiliary bishop of Gniezno. He’s obvioulsy missed the priests who have long-term “housekeepers,” have left to marry, have committed suicide because they cannot reconcile their conflicted relationships, or who have dumped their housekeeper and her (really their) children on the dioceses’ doorstep.

Of course “new trends” in Polish seminaries will change the balance. Perhaps Bishop Polak is concentrating on those changes.

More from Bishop Polak in Catholic Church in Poland reports sharp drop in vocations. Methinks that the Bishop has his fingers in his ears and is signing a hymn very loudly.

Christian Witness, Media, PNCC, , ,

More on celibacy

From the Kennebec Journal: Celibate priests: boon or bane?

I won’t go on to quote from the article. It’s the usual set of arguments and some of the typical confusion between man-made laws like celibacy and other teachings that people would like to change even though they are immutable. I cite the article only because it contains a reference to the PNCC.

Personally, I think that the media would be just as disenchanted with the Catholic teaching of the PNCC as they are with the Roman Church’s teachings on secular culture’s hot-button issues.

If a writer were to set aside those big red arguments and develop some sort of columnar list of agreed points and differences I think they would be able to develop a compelling piece on Churches’ varied approaches to the human condition and Their understanding of God’s relationship to mankind. Of course it would take time and a lot of research. Anyone out there?

Perspective, Political, , , , ,

All for fear

From TPMCafe: Huntington revisited

After Professor Samuel Huntington passed away on December 24, I held off commenting on his work during the first 30 days of mourning out of respect for the norms that govern such a period. I believe we are now ready for a balanced review of his work.

The theme that runs throughout Huntington’s various works is best characterized as a theory of fear. His books typically identify a mounting threat, such as Mexican immigrants, Islamic civilization, or democratic proclivities, and then point to the need for strong national-unity building measures and mobilization of the people (including militarization) in response to the barbarians at the gates. Sometimes, the argument is formulated in basically analytical terms: If the required vigorous responses to the particular challenge at hand are not forthcoming, various calamities will ensue (e.g., the U.S. will lose a large part of its territory to Mexico and its Anglo-Protestant identity will be undermined) that will implicitly call for stronger countermeasures. In other cases, advocacy for powerful antidotes is quite explicit. As Huntington puts it in the Foreword to Who Are We?, he is writing as a patriot and a scholar, in that order.

Taken on its own, the threat-response thesis is unproblematic, a correlation the validity of which even people without social training can readily discern, and one that has often been repeated in the annals of social analysis. When the Nazis were about to overrun Britain, the country suspended habeas corpus. And few, even among the strongest supporters of Israel, would deny that while continuous threats from armed neighbors and terrorists and the responses to these threats have helped keep the segments of Israeli society together, they have also involved a measure of militarization and have imposed limits on civil rights.

The key issue then is to determine whether a nation truly faces particular threats or whether such concerns are largely drummed up, if not totally manufactured–say, in order to keep a nation under the control of one powerful elite or another and to make its citizens accept various governmental measures that they otherwise would not tolerate. These measures might include the curtailment of rights, economic belt-tightening, and discrimination against foreigners, among others. It is a familiar issue, seen for example in the debates over whether or not Saddam actually possessed nuclear weapons that could pose an imminent threat to the United States. Even more recently, it has been witnessed in the argument over whether or not Social Security is indeed in “crisis.” We must ask: If the various threats are real, what is their magnitude? And if the dangers are vastly exaggerated, what purposes are served by such a politics of fear…

A good read, putting our country’s trends in perspective. The only point I would make is that Huntington just represented one side of the fear mongering elitist class. It really isn’t left/right, liberal/conservative, Democrat/Republican. The sins are the same, the power grab in a different dress; with all the dresses from the same nation over individual dressmaker. Sadly, our rights diminish, our freedoms like sands through the fingers of a fear filled child.

PNCC, Poland - Polish - Polonia,

Lenten fish fries and other culinary delights

In the Albany, New York area check out the Polish Community Center, 225 Washington Ave Ext, Albany NY 12205 (call 518-456-3995) every Friday between February 27th and April 10th, 4-8pm for a tremendous fish fry. My family and I went last week. I literally felt like the Apostles had just dumped their nets full of fish on the table. The fish was tasty, with great fixins’ and a side of homemade sauerkraut salad. The service was personal and exceptional. They have Polish beers too — you can’t go wrong…

fishfry

From the Cleveland Plain Dealer: Lent is here and that means it’s fish-fry season: Your local guide

St. Mary’s Polish National Catholic Church — 5375 Broadview Road, Parma, Ohio. 216-741-8154. 4-7 p.m. Fridays, March 13 through March 27. $8. Includes pierogi, slaw or applesauce, fries, bread and butter, coffee and dessert.

As BigSister28 noted in the comments section to the article: “St. Mary’s Polish National Catholic Church on Broadview Road has, without a doubt, the best pierogies. And the best homemade cupcakes for dessert.

…and from the Standard-Speaker: Hometown happenings

A potato cake and soup sale will be held at Ss. Peter and Paul PNCC, Adams Street, McAdoo, Pennsylvania on every Friday during lent and the soups available include pasta fagoli, tomato, potato mushroom, vegetarian vegetable, macaroni and cheese and haluski. Advanced orders are appreciated, but walk-ins are welcome. For more information call 570-929-1250 or 570-929-1558.

Smacznego! Bon Appétit!

Poetry

March 2 – My vocabulary by Rafał Wojaczek

My vocabulary so small! Hope’s term Tomorrow
Is only conjugated in Your person
While Love’s word evades my tongue and fails
To compose itself from Hunger’s letters

By despair emboldened, I’m leaving Your dream
Gripping my own with teeth in desperate hope.
Tell me: is there anything else to do
When even Death can’t verbalize its works?

Translation by Tomasz Gil and used with permission of the translator.

dictionary

Mój słownik jest ubogi! Słowo nadziei: “jutro”
Odmienia się jedynie przez Twoją osobę.
A już słowo miłości omija język: złożyć
Z głosek głodu się nie chce lub składa za późno,

Gdy już, rozpaczą harda, Twój sen opuszczam: z moim
Snem w zębach, jak nadzieja rozpaczliwa każe.
Powiedz: czy coś innego czynić mi pozostaje,
Gdy śmierć też nie potrafi jeszcze się wysłowić?

LifeStream

Daily Digest for 2009-03-01

lastfm (feed #3) 11:37am Scrobbled a song on Last.fm.

twitter (feed #4) 9:40pm Posted a tweet on Twitter.

New blog post: First Sunday of Lent – B http://tinyurl.com/ae2u64
facebook (feed #7) 9:40pm Updated status on Facebook.

Deacon Jim New blog post: First Sunday of Lent – B http://tinyurl.com/ae2u64.
twitter (feed #4) 9:59pm Posted a tweet on Twitter.

New blog post: March 1 – Camomile by Jurgis BaltruŁ¡aitis http://tinyurl.com/cu2gnf
facebook (feed #7) 9:59pm Updated status on Facebook.

Deacon Jim New blog post: March 1 – Camomile by Jurgis BaltruŁ¡aitis http://tinyurl.com/cu2gnf.
facebook (feed #7) 12:02am Updated status on Facebook.

Deacon Jim New blog post: March 2 – My vocabulary by Rafał Wojaczek http://tinyurl.com/dhjxju.
twitter (feed #4) 12:02am Posted a tweet on Twitter.

New blog post: March 2 – My vocabulary by Rafał Wojaczek http://tinyurl.com/dhjxju
Poetry

March 1 – Camomile by Jurgis BaltruŁ¡aitis

Camomile, you mite of whiteness,
To refresh the road I’ve taken,
Rising from the dust, you stand there,
With your glowing head uplifted…

For a poor man trekking stubbles,
Such a blossom’s full of riches —“
Now I’m not alone, that’s certain —“
In earth’s void, I’m not forsaken…

Cured the ills of nagging hardship,
Quiet now the pain of longing,
Vanished from my breast the exile’s
Terror of earth crucifixion…

Since you’ve brimmed the sun’s own chalice,
Darkling, I stride on more surely,
While my heart in silence reckons
What you’re singing to my spirit…

Translated by Demie Jonaitis

matricaria_february_2008-1

RamunÄ—le tu baltoji,
Kad iŁ¡puoŁ¡tum mano kelią,
Tu i١ dulkiٳ atsistoji,
Skaisčią pakeli galvelę…

Vargui – takui pro rugienas
Tavo پiedas – dپiaugsmo kraitis.
٠tai pasauly a١ ne vienas,
Jo bedugnÄ—j ne naŁ¡laitis…

Skurdo skausmas lyg pagijo,
Skausmo ilgesys nurimo,
Ir kr٫tinė jau nebijo
Kryپiaus پemÄ—s iŁ¡trÄ—mimo…

SaulÄ—s taurę tu pripylei,
Ir, tamsus, پygiuoju drąsiai,
Ir ١irdis tik klauso tyliai,
Ką tu giedi mano dvasiai…

Homilies,

First Sunday of Lent – B

First reading: Genesis 9:8-15
Psalm: Ps 25:4-9
Epistle: 1 Peter 3:18-22
Gospel: Mark 1:12-15

“See, I am now establishing my covenant with you
and your descendants after you——¨

Deals, agreements, contracts…the history of the Old Testament is marked by a series of these covenants. In turn, the covenants are marked by symbols of remembrance.

A history of promises

We know of God’s promise, His covenant with Abraham. God promised many things to Abraham. He promised that He would make Abraham’s name great (Genesis 12:2), that Abraham would have numerous descendants (Genesis 13:16), that he would be the father of a multitude of nations (Genesis 17:4-5). God also promised that the families of the world will be blessed through Abraham’s descendant, the Messiah (Genesis 22:18).

God made various promises to Moses. In Deuteronomy 30:1-10 God renewed the promise He gave Abraham regarding the land Israel was to inherit. In addition, God laid out, in the Mosaic Covenant (Deuteronomy 11; et seq.), a set of conditional covenants that brought blessings for Israel’s obedience or curses for their disobedience. We remember these as the ten commandments and the rest of the law which contained over 600 commands—”with roughly 300 blessings and 300 curses.

God also gave David the promise that his descendant would inherit his throne and occupy it forever. The Davidic Covenant (2 Samuel 7:8-16) amplifies the promise God gave Abraham, that his seed would bless the world. This promise to David is key because God promised that David’s physical line of descent would last forever and that his kingdom would never pass away. This kingdom, furthermore, would have a ruling individual exercising authority over it. That ruler, that king, is our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ (Luke 1:32-33) who lives forever.

Our first reading from Genesis showed God establishing a covenant, an agreement with Noah.

Who makes the promise, and how?

In each of these instances we see the promise being made. Further, for every promise a marking, or a symbol, is given.

Now these promises are not like the promises we make. Our experience is to enter into agreements with each other. Our promises involve exchanges and mutual promises. If I want to put a new roof on my house I enter into a contract with a roofer. I expect them to put a proper roof on my house using proper materials. In exchange they expect payment, or a series of payments. The promise is the contract, the sign of the promise are the paper the contract is written on, and the fulfillment of the contract is the work and my payment.

God’s covenants don’t work that way. God’s covenants are normally unconditional. God obligates Himself when He unrestrictedly declares, ‘I will.’ God promises to accomplish, or bring about His promises despite any failure on the part of the person or people with whom He covenants. Looking at God’s promise to Noah, we see that He makes the promise, He sets the sign by which the promise is to be remembered, and He fulfills the promise. All of these are unconditional.

There are other, physical symbols of the covenants I mentioned earlier. When God promised Abraham the land and descendants — Abraham asked for a sign — which meant that he wanted a contract. In those days, when two people entered a contract, they brought a sacrifice, divided it in two, and each passed between the the two pieces, through its blood, to seal the contract. God told Abraham (Genesis 15:1-21):

‘Bring me a heifer three years old, a she-goat three years old, a ram three years old, a turtledove, and a young pigeon.’ And he brought him all these, cut them in two, and laid each half over against the other; but he did not cut the birds in two. And when birds of prey came down upon the carcasses, Abram drove them away. As the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell on Abram; and lo, a dread and great darkness fell upon him…When the sun had gone down and it was dark, behold, a smoking fire pot and a flaming torch passed between these pieces.

Abraham did not pass through. God, alone passed through, signified by the smoking fire pot and a flaming torch. God made the covenant with Himself. He promised to do it, signing the contract Himself.

Now the human response to God’s covenants is always important. Our positive response leads to blessing. But regardless, human failure can never abrogate the covenant or block its fulfillment. Abraham, Moses, Noah, David — at one point or another each met with sin and failure. Each had a moment or moments where they exhibited a lack of faith in God. Yet, God’s promise lives on and is fulfilled regadless of their failure.

Who holds the promise maker accountable

Getting back to my earlier roofing example, if my roofer doesn’t deliver, or if I fail to pay, we each have remedies available. I can sue him, he can sue me. We can pursue each other in order to bring about the fulfillment of the promise. Each promise implies accountability.

God is accountable as well. While He gives us His promise, He holds Himself accountable for its fulfillment. God never leads us down the primrose path. He never tells a lie. His promise is true. He holds Himself personally accountable, and in the end, we see that He personally fulfilled each and every promise He ever made.

Where are we, what is our promise

My brothers and sisters,

We stand here in the midst of the fulfillment of those covenants. Our promise is the sum of promises fulfilled in Christ Jesus.

We are part of the new and everlasting covenant marked by the sign we pray before, the sign we are marked with at baptism, the sign we mark ourselves with – the holy and all blessed Cross of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

This new covenant renews our minds and hearts, restores favor and blessing to the members of the Holy Church — the new and everlasting Israel. The new covenant in the blood of Christ forgives and removes all of our sins, and brings about an indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

The new covenant in the blood of Christ went into effect at the Last Supper during which our Lord and Savior gave us His body and blood. He made His disciples the first heirs and leaders of a new body of believers — the Holy Church. They were called to invite Jews and Gentile alike. Come, enter into the new covenant.

Under the new covenant all those who belong to Christ, who are members of the Holy Church, benefit by being called children of God (Romans 8:16), the household of God (Ephesians 2:19), the children of Abraham (Galatians 3:7), and the children of promise (Romans 9:8). We are a people of His own (Titus 2:14), are heirs of God according to promise (Galatians 3:29) and heirs of the kingdom (James 2:5). Further, we are God’s people called the temple of God (1 Corinthians 3:16), the circumcision (Philippians 3:3), the Israel of God (Galatians 6:16). We are called a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a chosen people, a holy nation (1 Peter 2:9) and we are sons of God (John 1:12), the kings and priests of God (Revelation 1:6), the Bride of Christ (2 Corinthians 11:2) and finally, the Body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12).

Ours is the final promise

We have the final promise. Our covenant is in God Who has fulfilled His promise, and Who did so Himself. We proclaim that this covenant, this promise, is both new and eternal.

St. Paul in addressing the Hebrews, tells us (Hebrews 9:11-12):

But when Christ appeared…he entered once for all into the Holy Place, taking not the blood of goats and calves but his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption.

Paul confirms that Jesus told us that He had come to do the Father’s will, that is, to fulfill the Father’s promises, and that (Hebrews 10:10):

by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

Today’s second reading from first Peter says the same:

Christ suffered for sins once,
the righteous for the sake of the unrighteous,
that he might lead you to God.—¨

The symbol/sign of the final promise

Thus the cross of Christ is our symbol, our sign, our joy, our happiness, our boast. It is the sign of God’s coming to fulfill His promises. It is the granting of fulfillment to all those who come seeking God’s truth. That is you, that is me. All whose hearts desire God share in the promise, and yes, even those who reject God. They too share in the promise. The cross, the body and blood of Christ given to us, is an everlasting contract. It is a contract written by God, written out through the sacrificial death of God’s only Son, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, and signed in His blood.

Living in the promise

If I told you that you had just won one million dollars you might be amazed for a second. Then you would look at me rather intently and think: ‘Deacon, where did you get a million and why are you giving it away?’

We stand here, looking at this beautiful cross, and ponder God’s remarkable promise. We are God’s children, household, people, heirs, a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation. We are God’s sons, kings and priests, the Bride of Christ and the Body of Christ. Sometimes we look at all this, rather intently, and can’t really believe that all of this is ours. Yet it is. We posses the promise of God and we posses its fulfillment.

The response — that is up to us.

We are called to respond, to acknowledge the reality of God’s promise, and to share our knowledge of this gift. The promise has changed everything. Make the sign of the cross, acknowledge the Holy Faith, recall the promise, and share it. Tell Jew and Gentile alike: Hearts and minds have been renewed, The favor and blessing of God is here, sins are forgiven, and the Holy Spirit dwells here. Echo the words the Lord spoke:

“This is the time of fulfillment.
—¨The kingdom of God is at hand.—¨
Repent, and believe in the gospel.”

Amen.