Welcoming Benedict XVI at today’s Ecumenical Prayer Service
Words of Welcome from His Excellency The Most Reverend Dennis J. Sullivan, Vicar General, R.C. Diocese of New York:
Most Holy Father, welcome to Saint Joseph’s Parish!
This community of faith was established in 1873 to serve the German Catholics residing in the Yorkville area of the Borough of Manhattan. In 1894, its present church was dedicated by His Eminence, John Cardinal McCloskey, Archbishop of New York and the first American to be appointed to the College of Cardinals.
Since that time, Saint Joseph’s Parish has continued to attend to the spiritual needs of the German Catholic community. Indeed, Mass is celebrated here in German by a priest assigned to this work by the Bishops’ Conference of the Federal Republic of Germany. At the present time, however, the congregation is marvelously diverse, with parishioners whose ethnic backgrounds include the nations and peoples of Europe, Asia, Africa, and especially Latin America.
It is altogether fitting, therefore, that you are meeting here, Most Holy Father, with representatives from a wide array of Churches and Communions. For together they reflect the great variety of Christian traditions to be found throughout New York and across the nation and the world.
In 1965, with the conclusion of the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Bishops of the United States, guided by the Decree on Ecumenism, —Unitatis Redintegratio,— and directives of your predecessors, committed themselves to pursue ever more earnestly that unity for which the Savior prayed on the night before He died. Thus, they entered into dialogues with the Orthodox, the Episcopalians, the Lutherans, the Methodists, the Evangelicals, the Southern Baptists, the Reformed and the Polish National Catholics, among others; and from these dialogues, has come forth an extraordinary number of carefully considered statements to lead us wisely and securely on the path toward unity.
Much, of course, remains to be done especially in our parishes and congregations, where ecumenical prayer, theological discussions, and the united pursuit of justice, charity, and peace need to be promoted and encouraged across denominational boundaries with unlimited trust in the providence of our Loving God.
With all of this in mind, we again welcome you, Most Holy Father. We know of your commitment to ecumenism, and we thank you most sincerely for addressing a number of unresolved theological issues among Christians in your splendid Encyclical Letters, —God Is Love— and —Saved by Hope.— Thus it is that we await your words with interest, gratitude, and genuine affection in Jesus Christ, the one Lord and Savior of us all.
Benedict XVI Papal Address to the gathered Churches is found at the USCCB website in full.
Just watched the EWTN coverage of the event. I noticed that New York’s Edward Cardinal Egan introduced leaders of the various Churches at the conclusion of the service but snubbed the Prime Bishop of the PNCC. That after his Vicar General made a specific reference to the PNCC. A faux pas or intentional, wondering minds want to know.
as far as I know, those religious leaders who were called up to greet the Pope were those who were based in New York. That is why the PB of the PNCC was not personally recognized.
While this is a tangent, the question has been on my mind for some time. Was the ban of excommunication against Bishop Hodur every formally rescinded? The question was hinted to by another reader in another post, but I haven’t found an answer anywhere on the web.
Francis,
The short answer is no.
A 1992 NYT article describes the first visit of R.C. Church officials to St. Stanislaus. While they came as a first step and a symbol of rapprochement, they did not bring a lifting of the excommunication.
This is similar to the situation with Abp. Lefebvre. While the R.C. Church maintains a dialog with the Society of St. Pius X, they have not lifted their excommunication of him. I do not think (personal opinion here) the the PNCC necessarily cares. We do not recognize things like excommunications or anathemas as a reality. Bishop Hodur respected each individual’s search for God. He said:
Dcn. Adam,
I do not necessarily agree. If Archbishop Demetrios, of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America were stationed in another town or city, I am certain he would have been recognized as would the Presiding Bishop of The Episcopal Church if she had been there (over and above Bishop Sisk of the New York Diocese).
Certainly, as you note, many of the representatives were those closely involved in Ecumenical relations with the R.C. Archdiocese of New York, but as a USCCB article notes, 10 national church leaders and 5 local church leaders were to be recognized. Were they just set on 15 as the magic number?
I just expected the Prime Bishop to be recognized as the leader of the Church with one of the most active dialogs with the R.C. Church. I think it was an error on their part not to recognize him. Just my opinion…
I agree that the PNCC should have been recognized if the introductions were not a local thing as well.
I was just going by what Bp Mikovsky stated that it seemed only local leaders were recognized.