Perspective, PNCC,

Lead us not…

From the BBC: French villagers back priest with partner

A Catholic priest in south-west France has been forced out of the clergy after admitting to the Church authorities that he was having a sexual relationship with one of his parishioners. The BBC’s Emma Jane Kirby says this has set off a fresh debate about celibacy in the Church.

There is a wonderful sense of stillness in the mountains overlooking the little village of Asson – a few swallows surf gently on the upwind currents and a shepherd sits quietly watching his flock of fat, thickly pelted sheep graze on the velvet grass.

It is a bit like one of those bucolic woodcut scenes you find in ancient bibles. But, in this religious landscape, those who break the rules are quickly cast asunder.

To a passer by, Fr Leon and his partner Marga probably look like any other middle-aged couple taking an evening stroll together.

He is twinkly eyed and looks a little like Dustin Hoffman. She seems warm and open and is still a very attractive woman. But in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church, Leon and Marga are sinners.

‘Closer to God’

For the past 22 years, the couple have been in a sexual relationship, which is forbidden to a Catholic priest who has vowed to remain celibate. Fr Leon admits he has broken his promise but claims that being in love has brought him closer to God and his congregation.

“I haven’t been strictly faithful to all my vows,” he says.

“And I worried that by breaking some of those vows I had hurt Our Lord. But I think God can see that my relationship with Marga has brought real fruits to the Church – far from being a handicap to my mission as a priest, she’s been a great support. I just wish the Church could see that.”

There is no doubt that Fr Leon has been an excellent parish priest…

Let’s do some parsing out of the good Father’s problem.

Now certainly living with and having a sexual relationship with Marga is sinful and improper. Father and Marga are committing adultery – and Father, who is in a position of some authority (including social stature and economic resources) is committing a sin against her by not engendering his love for her in the state of matrimony.

There’s that nagging question though, are Father and Marga completely at fault for their actions? Let’s see if the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church can shed some light on that question.

II. RESPECT FOR THE DIGNITY OF PERSONS

Respect for the souls of others: scandal

2284 Scandal is an attitude or behavior which leads another to do evil. The person who gives scandal becomes his neighbor’s tempter. He damages virtue and integrity; he may even draw his brother into spiritual death. Scandal is a grave offense if by deed or omission another is deliberately led into a grave offense.

2285 Scandal takes on a particular gravity by reason of the authority of those who cause it or the weakness of those who are scandalized. It prompted our Lord to utter this curse: “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened round his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.” (Mt 18:6; cf. I Cor 8:10-13.) Scandal is grave when given by those who by nature or office are obliged to teach and educate others. Jesus reproaches the scribes and Pharisees on this account: he likens them to wolves in sheep’s clothing. (Cf. Mt 7:15.)

2286 Scandal can be provoked by laws or institutions, by fashion or opinion.

Therefore, they are guilty of scandal who establish laws or social structures leading to the decline of morals and the corruption of religious practice, or to “social conditions that, intentionally or not, make Christian conduct and obedience to the Commandments difficult and practically impossible.” (Pius XII, Discourse, June 1,1941.) This is also true of business leaders who make rules encouraging fraud, teachers who provoke their children to anger, (Cf. Eph 6:4; Col 3:21.) or manipulators of public opinion who turn it away from moral values.

2287 Anyone who uses the power at his disposal in such a way that it leads others to do wrong becomes guilty of scandal and responsible for the evil that he has directly or indirectly encouraged. “Temptations to sin are sure to come; but woe to him by whom they come!” (Lk 17:1.)

We’re getting there.

As I have often said, demanding gifts from the Holy Spirit doesn’t work. The Holy Spirit is not going to give the gift or grace of celibate living to every priest. In addition, I recall no calling down of that gift from the Holy Spirit in the Roman Church’s Rite of Ordination to the Diaconate or Priesthood. There is a promise made in the Ordination Rite to the Order of Deacon, but, that is a human promise, subject to the maturation of the person making that promise.

Priests in the Roman Church are put in a lonely and difficult position. Is the grace given to some, to fulfill their calling as part of a celibatecelibacy means no marriage, as opposed to chastity, which we are all called to practice (i.e., Thou shalt not commit adultery) life actually necessary for all? My Church certainly doesn’t think so, nor do most Catholic bodies in the world.

I fully support clergy members who are given the grace of celibacy. I think we all pray for them and support them in their ministry. However, it is not necessary onto salvation.

In part, the good Father’s sins are his own making. In part, they are not, but caused by a man made system that applied absolutely, damages more than it helps.

Pray for Fr. Leon and Marga.

Father Leon, if you ever come across this article, write to us. Our Church would be happy to welcome you and Marga.

4 thoughts on “Lead us not…

  1. You forget one option: Father Leon can leave the
    priesthood and marry the women – if that relationship
    is more important to him than his relationship with
    his Creator for eternity. We all have free will. Father
    Leon wants to “eat his cake and have it too” (which
    is the proper phrasing for that adage).

  2. I hope you are not saying that choosing a relationship with God and with a woman is impossible, or that choosing a woman forces an exclusion of God.

    You are correct, he should marry her – and doing otherwise is improper and sinful on its face. At the same time, he should not be forced to choose between two natural choices – both created by God. Both of which he may be called to (that’s between God, him, and his spiritual director).

    The problem is the forced choice, often made in a noise that excludes God and love. Choose her, loose your home, car, pension, salary, health insurance, ability to say the Holy Mass. Choose the Church (implied God) and you are forbidden to love the person who loves you in a committed life. Walking a mile in his shoes I can imagine the spiritual, mental, and emotional agony of those choices. Walking a mile in his shoes I can imagine thinking that the Church (implied God) hates me.

    He’s certainly not a young man, throwing it all away for love is not all that easy. I’m sure that like me, you can relate to being in that settled/established state.

    In all of this, who speaks for God?

    Thus, man made power and man made rules, unrecognized in the unified Church, creates the occasion to scandal.

    The situation he, and many priests are in, creates so many occasions to sin that I would have to ask, Are the fruits derived from the rule worth it?

    I would imagine that any random selection of priests promising celibacy might reveal the following:

    A number of chaste and unchaste homosexuals.
    A number of chaste and unchaste heterosexuals.

    Leaving out the homosexuals, of the heterosexuals,

    1. A number called to the celibate life and worthily fulfilling that call (this would happen in any event, regardless of rules).
    2. A number not called to the celibate life, and struggling daily, attempting to fulfill their promise.
    3. A number not called to the celibate life, enjoying the money, prestige, and position they have and using that to be abusively unchaste.
    4. A number not called to the celibate life, living unchaste lives, feeling trapped and conflicted because of broken promises and based on immaturity, unable to resolve the issue (BTW – these are the suicides so rarely talked about).
    5. A number not called to the celibate life, living unchaste lives, feeling trapped and conflicted because they truly love both Church and the woman they are with, and trying to work out the issue as best they can.

    Of all of these, those in the first category are going to be effective.

    Those in the second may become effective, may work it all out, and their suffering bears merit. But the question is, Why pile crosses on those who have a heavy burden to bear based on their calling.

    The rest are damaged in ways only God knows.

    For all the logical reasoning and treatises written on celibacy — and having been in the seminary and having taken the courses and having talked with spiritual directors — no one knows the answer. How do you do this if it’s not you.

    Why the impediment and the man made cross for so many? Why the double standard, even in the Roman Church, a standard that follows the borders between Central-Eastern Europe and the rest of the world?

    In my estimation, and my Church’s, Fr. Leon need not be faced with a juridical dilemma. He can be a worthy priest and a worthy husband.

    I still don’t see why it cannot be so for Fr. Leon et.al.

  3. Sure, technically as they are now they’re wrong but interestingly from a European POV historically this story is not news! Catherine de Hueck Doherty wrote about travelling through Portugal in the 1930s where priests and village women were married in all but name. (Natural and understandable.) The patriarch of Lisbon told her he looked the other way with young priests.

  4. …and I think as we discussed before, many of those behaviors were exported to South America, both Spanish and Portugese.

    You know, it gets tough out in the colonies…

Comments are closed.