Year: 2006

Everything Else

—Your— information

Blogging is part of the Web 2.0 phenomenon. As bloggers we say and share a lot about ourselves, or at least about the public persona we want to put out there.

One of the social networking sites that is part of Web 2.0 is Facebook (background wiki). Business Week posted a story titled: Facebook Learns from Its Fumble.

Facebook members are upset because a new feature added to the site aggregates and distributes information they have posted about themselves. It aggregates this information out to people they have already chosen to share with.

The reaction of at least 90,000 Facebook members was negative. For the life of me I wonder why? Was seeing all your information in one place, in all its glory, too much? Perhaps they prefer that people visit their individual sites to gather the data – ’cause the visitors need to know everything they think about. See me, feel me…

The Business Week article notes that privacy protections at Facebook are very tight. Because of the tight controls people ‘feel secure.’ Guess what, you are not secure. It’s kind of like engaging in pre-marital sex. If you don’t want to become pregnant and you don’t want to get a disease, don’t do it.

If you are all so holier-than-thou about your personal privacy then get a clue —“ don’t post anything about yourself and please keep your opinions to yourself (or only share them with family members and friends one-on-one (you know, meet people, call them).

The right to have a public opinion means that you have to stand up in public and voice that opinion. The point of crafting a public persona is lost if you don’t stand up in public and build that persona (and hopefully you are honest about who you are).

If you want absolute privacy, here are some tips:

  • Don’t open a bank account,
  • Don’t apply for a credit card,
  • Deal strictly in cash,
  • Don’t register to vote,
  • Don’t own a home or car or anything of value,
  • Don’t go to school,
  • Don’t buy a domain name,
  • Don’t build a website, blog, or join a social networking community. Even if you think you are anonymous a quick look at the code behind your site can reveal quite a bit,
  • Never get listed as a family member in someone’s obituary, wedding announcement, or other life event,
  • If you contribute to charity do it in cash and don’t let them know who you are,
  • Don’t go to a doctor or dentist.

and…

I could go on for a long time.

Most of all remember that if you play fast and loose with your ‘personal’ data, anyone, including your fellow Facebook friends, can copy and distribute your stuff. Do you think they will say, ‘Ooops, I violated the user agreement?’ If they are doing such a thing it is out of malice. You are harmed, they may not care. You could get all mad and track them down and sue them. Yeah, right, the cost/time/hurdles are prohibitive, and no one believes in objective truth or ideals anymore anyway.

Once you put yourself out there you are in the public eye. Sure, if you’re like me not a lot of people are going to read what you think, but guess what, you are out there.

It all comes down to balance. As a Web 2.0 lurker, or even as good old fashioned html coder, you need to balance the kind of pride that makes you think you are the center of the world with the right desire to engage in community, to care, to laugh, to think and to grow…

Everything Else

Unity – except in politics and commentary

Fr. Stephen Freeman has reposted regarding a year old article by Fr. Thomas Hopko at Pontifications. The subject is the Orthodox approach toward Ecumenism, reunion between the Orthodox Church and Rome and the ever prevailing issue of the Papacy.

I’m thinking that part of the renewed interest in this article is the politics leading up to the reopening of discussions between Rome and Orthodoxy. Political wrangling often starts with hard and fast positions on every issue. People are throwing down the gauntlet because the possibility of even the smallest change is unsettling.

The Young Fogey provides some background including a link to Ad Orientem which reposts a comment from the Pontifications site by Owen of The Ochlophobist.

I highly suggest people read this commentary.

I have a few comments of my own.

Owen’s commentary certainly hit home for me as a member of the PNCC. Specifically:

Perhaps I am less irenic in tone because after some years of being Orthodox and then visiting a Novus Ordo Mass (in a —conservative— RC mega-parish) I was struck by the fact that it may as well have been a mainline Presbyterian service or a happy clappy Pentecostal service, it was so far from what I recognize Christianity to be. We think it kind in these circles to talk about what we have in common, but what is not said (enough anyway) is that what we have in common is all abstract. In the real flesh and blood terms of authentic communion we have very little in common.

Now I would only modify it by changing ‘abstract’ to ‘core’ but otherwise, how can an effective reunion be accomplished with a Church that (at least in the U.S.) is so different liturgically, sacramentally, and in terms of its discipline.

A Church Council would be the only logical way to hash out these issues. We would have to arrive at the sense of Catholic Christendom. The Council would have to include any truly Catholic body (Rome, Oriental, Eastern, PNCC). I have faith enough to know that a St. Athanasius would step forward in the process, leading us to the light given by the Holy Spirit.

Some have said that the PNCC is just like Rome or just like the Orthodox. In the sense of its Catholicity it is. In my estimation the PNCC is closer to the Orthodox in theology and understanding while being Western in practice (however far more solemn and centered, not Eastern Orthodox in externals but orthodox in practice).

In this I fully agree with Owen. People can say we are the same, but having come from the R.C. Church in the United States (having been brought up in a very traditional parish and having attended very liberal parishes) I can say that this supposition is not true. The PNCC is unique in its own existence as a body, and is far more Catholic in the essentials. We sit in a place that bridges the gap, and we face the same struggles as much of Orthodoxy in America. While we pray for unity, what we seek is the understanding and respect upon which any future unity needs to be based.

I believe that there needs to be a balance between headlong unity in everything and anything (ala Hopko) and unity in the essentials, i.e., more than just the core but less than the totality (i.e., economic unity —“ and I think the Russians hit this spot on).

Unity is not hopeless or impossible, but there are major roadblocks —“ the first and foremost, and the one every dialog dies on, is the role of the Pope. Until this issue is resolved by the totality of the Church Catholic we will have to struggle on.

Poland - Polish - Polonia, Political

Gwynne Dyer —“ Keeping the red banner waving

The Canadian ‘diplomatic’ journal Embassy which bills itself as Canada’s Foreign Policy Newsweekly published an article entitled Poland’s Terrible Twins by Gwynne Dyer on September 6, 2006.

The article is one of the most bigoted and intellectually absurd things I have ever read.

Embassy describes itself as follows:

International News, Opinions. Features, Culture and Lifestyle

Embassy is an unbiased and authoritative newsweekly focused on international affairs from a distinctively Canadian point of view and on the diplomatic community in Ottawa. Embassy gives its influential and prestigious readers breaking and informed news, society and cultural coverage and policy briefings to help make their work in Canada better informed and more effective.

If the following column represents the Canadian point-of-view I’d be greatly surprised.

[Heavy sarcasm warning]

“I am afraid that with Jaroslaw Kaczynski as prime minister, Poland will become more extreme, more anti-European and a more xenophobic country,” warned Bronislaw Komorowski, a member of the opposition Civic Platform party, when the second Kaczynski twin was made prime minister by his brother, President Lech Kaczynski, in July. He could have added that Poland is becoming more anti-Semitic, more homophobic, and much more vengeful towards former Communists and collaborators.

Right out of the box the author finds a self hating Pole, and a political opponent of the current administration, to set the tone. It does not appear that this is going to be a thoughtful analysis. Oh, and the anti-Semitism thing – don’t forget, all Poles get it with their mother’s milk; although we might have gotten the homophobia thing from the right breast.

The Kaczynski twins, chubby 57-year-olds whose baby faces remind everyone that they first shot to fame as child actors in the 1960s, are identical in both their appearance and their politics. They are nationalist, Catholic, and conservative (as mayor of Warsaw, Lech banned gay parades and called the organizers “perverts”), which is why they appeal to the left-behinds of Polish society, the rural, the poor and the uneducated, who provided most of the votes for their Law and Justice Party last year.

Yes, yes, the stupid Polish Catholic potato pickers are thousands of years behind the rest of civilization. I don’t know (being a Catholic potato picker myself) but I think that a person’s looks have very little to do with their political disposition (I know, the enemy is always ugly). I do know that if one is conservative and Catholic, one ought to stick with the platform they embrace. To do otherwise would make one a hypocrite or a liberal secularist —“ you know, someone without any objective standards. Everything is cool —“ just don’t hurt me.

Then they promised that they would never occupy both of the great offices of state, and Jaroslaw remained as party leader while Lech took the presidency. But the man he appointed as prime minister instead, Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, showed an unexpected streak of independence, so two months ago Lech fired him and appointed Jaroslaw in his place.

Since then, it has gone from bad to worse: Quarrels with Germany, with Russia, with the European Union that Poland joined only two years ago—“and above all, a determined drive to punish everybody who served or helped the Communist regime that collapsed 17 years ago.

The problem being… and this from an alleged historian.

The campaign’s most prominent victim is former president Wojciech Jaruzelski, who declared martial law in 1981 and jailed about 10,000 Solidarity members. Jaruzelski has always claimed that he did it only to forestall a Soviet invasion that would have ended in a national disaster, for the Poles would have fought back, the country would have been devastated, and all possibility of reform would have been lost for decades.

And serial murderers claim they didn’t do it either. And rapists claim it was the woman’s fault.

Most of Soldarity’s former leaders now accept Jaruzelski’s justification for his decision, though they spent years in jail because of it. Former president Lech Walesa, Solidarity’s founder, was publicly reconciled with Jaruzelski last year in a joint television appearance. But Jaruzelski is now charged with being the head of an “organized criminal group which aimed to perpetrate crimes that consisted of the deprivation of freedom by internment,” and at the age of 82 he faces a possible 11years in jail. Hundreds of thousands of other Poles also face reprisals under the new law introduced by the Kaczynskis.

Under the old rules, members of parliament, judges, and top civil servants and security officials were required to state whether they had collaborated with the Communist-era secret police, but they were not automatically banned from those jobs. Under the new law, all persons in “positions of public trust” who were over 17when Solidarity finally brought down the Communists in1989, including diplomats, local officials, school principals, lawyers and journalists, will lose their jobs if they cannot produce a certificate (to be issued by the Institute for National Remembrance) showing that they were not collaborators.

Employers who do not demand certificates from their employees will also lose their jobs. The secret police files of people who held public office under the Communists will be published on the internet, together with the names of all former secret policemen. And of course thousands of individuals will be punished in this way because of false or misleading information in those files.

Similar things happened in other countries of the former Soviet bloc just after the Communist regimes were swept away by the revolutions of 1989, though nothing so extreme. But to institute such a witch-hunt 17 years later, when most of the targets of this revenge are retired or nearing the end of their working lives, is vindictive and pointlessly destructive.

Oh, I see now. Mr. Dyer is shilling for the communists. You know, collective farms, mass starvation, work camps, disappearing family members, gulags, Siberia…

Now imagine if you will that Mr. Dyer is walking the streets of Buenos Aries and runs across Dr. Mengele. I imagine he would bow and say, look you’re old and I don’t want to be vindictive —“ here’s a free pass. No, no, don’t be silly, Gen. Jaruzelski only shot a few Poles, had some stupid Catholic clergy killed, unjustly imprisoned people —“ a small price to pay to keep the red banner waving. Let’s all sing the Internationale and get along…

It is the same resentful obsession with past wrongs that caused President Kaczynski to cancel a visit to Germany recently after a small-circulation German newspaper satirized him as a “potato-head”. It gives rise to demands that Poland erect a memorial to the 1940 massacre at Katyn, in which Soviet troops murdered at least 15,000 Polish reserve officers, directly across the street from the Russian embassy. And it turns a blind eye to anti-Semitism, gay-bashing and other relics from the darker parts of Poland’s past.

The full list of sins defined by secularists can be found at —“ now where is my little red book? Let’s take 15,000 Canadians and shoot them, dumping their remains in mass graves. Oh, and grab a few million more and deport them to death camps in Siberia (well northern Canada at least). I’m sure Canadians won’t mind —“ the Poles certainly shouldn’t mind, at least according to Mr. Dyer. And let’s be sure to stereotype whole societies by the sins of a few. All Canadians are… now where’s that little red book again?

The funny thing is that Mr. Dyer, if he were a Pole in Eastern Poland at the time, would have been one of the first to be shot at Katyn. They weren’t just military officers, they were doctors, lawyers, writers, and intellectuals.

Poland is highly nationalist because it has had a dreadful history of partition, conquest and oppression at the hands of its far bigger neighbours, Germany and Russia. It is the most Catholic country in Europe because its religion was a rallying point during the long decades of foreign occupation. It is socially conservative because almost half its people are still essentially rural. None of that is bad in itself, but the Kaczynskis know how to push all of Poland’s buttons, and they do it shamelessly and relentlessly.

Here Mr. Dyer makes a fleeting attempt to honor his PhD in History. I wonder if he played this fast a loose with the facts in his doctoral dissertation. Maybe his academic advisers were just wowed when he sang Czerwony sztandar (The Red Standard – the hymn of the Polish proletariat) in the original. Doctoral research is tough business.

Two million young Poles—“over five percent of the population—“have left the country for greener pastures in western Europe since EU membership made it easy for them to move. The 17 per cent unemployment rate, the highest in the EU, gave them a big incentive to go, but in many cases that wasn’t all that pushed them out. There is another Poland, but quite a lot of it is currently living abroad.

And Polish immigrants contribute exactly how much toward Canadian society (now checking the little red book)? Anyway, we don’t want those Catholic potato pickers polluting our liberal society – keep ’em home!

Now let me make a few needlessly stupid, uneducated, uncouth, and misleading statements —“ uh, no —“ that would put me at Mr. Dyer’s level.

What I can offer is the English translation for Czerwony Sztandar

The workers’ flag is deepest red,
It shrouded oft our martyred dead;
And ere their limbs grew stiff and cold
Their life-blood dyed its every fold.

Then raise the scarlet standard high;
Within its shade we’ll live and die,
Though cowards flinch and traitors sneer,
We’ll keep the red flag flying here.

Mr. Dyer —“ keeping those red flags dyed a deep red.

Embassy – 69 Sparks St., Ottawa, ON, K1P 5A5 – Tel: (613) 232-2922 Fax: (613) 232-9055

Saints and Martyrs

September 7 – St. Regina (Św. Regina)

Chwalebna panno i męczenniczko św. Regino, wejrzyj na mnie litościwem okiem z onej górnej światłości, w której nasycasz się ciągle widzeniem Boga, i uproś mi tę łaskę, abyśmy więcej cenili wiarę i przykazania Boże, aniżeli zysk i względy światowe, które nas na bezdroża prowadzą. Amen.

Christian Witness, Current Events, Media

Ralph ‘Bucky’ Philips and family values

Donn Esmonde of the Buffalo News comments about the Ralph ‘Bucky’ Phillips tragedy unfolding in Western New York in Fugitive’s family values perverse.

As you may know, Mr. Phillips escaped from jail several months ago. He is suspected of shooting three NY State Troopers and of killing one, trooper Joseph Longobardo.

In the article Mr. Esmonde highlights the Christian witness of a local R.C. pastor, Fr. Patrick Elis. Beyond that, Mr. Esmonde makes an excellent case in regard to the responsibilities of fathers to their families and to all families. Excerpts follow:

Family? This guy doesn’t know anything about family.

In the stomach-churning saga of fugitive Ralph “Bucky” Phillips, perhaps the most nauseating notion is of this man standing up for family.

That is what a friend of Phillips’ told The Buffalo News last week, after two state troopers on stakeout near Phillips’ ex-girlfriend’s house were shot. Dan Suitor said State Police brought the ambush upon themselves by – days earlier – arresting Phillips’ daughter, her mother and boyfriend for helping Phillips avoid authorities.

“That was like a declaration of war,” said Suitor, who believes Phillips was the shooter. “You do not mess with [Phillips’] family or his friends.”

Pardon me while I gag.

If Ralph Phillips did what police believe, not since Charles Manson led his self-styled “family” astray has one man done so much harm to so many families – including his own. Phillips’ daughter, her mother and his grandchildren all have been put in harm’s way by his actions.

“Nothing he has done [since escaping prison five months ago] has helped his family,” said the Rev. Patrick Elis, who offered his Cassadaga church as a safe surrender site. “Not at all.”

Monday we endured TV images of the widow of slain state trooper Joseph Longobardo as her husband’s body was returned to his Albany-area home. Teri Longobardo, a kindergarten teacher, planned Thursday to celebrate her fourth wedding anniversary. Instead she will mourn her dead husband. In her arms was their 13-month-old son. Little Louis Longobardo will never know his father.

Now tell me how much Ralph Phillips cares about family.

The guy spent most of his 44 years in jail. A real family man would have stayed out of stir, found a job and lived up to his responsibilities as a father.

No real family man would ever purposely destroy another man’s family. No one who values the web of a family’s interconnections, no one who realizes how every part – mom, dad, guardian, aunt, child, whoever – is a vital piece of a larger puzzle, would purposely destroy a family. Not for any reason.

If Phillips truly cared about his family, he would take up Elis’ offer to turn himself in. Elis says he will put the $225,000 reward into a trust fund for Phillips’ grandchildren. The money gives them a chance at a better life than Phillips made for himself.

Everything Else,

They’re coming back…

I received a CM Almy 2006-2007 liturgical catalog today. Since I am not independently wealthy I do not shop at Almy, but I like to look.

I noticed that this version of the catalog has a lot more in terms of dalmatics (some nice traditional styles and some modernist stuff) and they have maniples!

Maniples are certainly used in some PNCC parishes (we have several beautiful sets in our parish), and I know that they are used in traditionalist R.C. circles, as well as by some Anglo-Catholics, but finding them in this kind of catalog —“ well where have I been?

I’ve always been a firm believer in ‘the clothes make the man.’ Too many rush through the process of getting vested, skipping the vesting prayers. Careful attention to detail helps us remember whom we are to re-present and how we are to conduct ourselves. It is also a good lesson for altar servers. I also try to pray with our altar servers before the beginning of Holy Mass.

Here are vesting prayers that are commonly (or uncommonly) used:

When washing the hands: Give virtue to my hands, O Lord, that being cleansed from all stain I might serve you with purity of mind and body.

With the amice: Place upon me, O Lord, the helmet of salvation, that I may overcome the assaults of the devil.

With the alb: Purify me, O Lord, and cleanse my heart; that, being made white in the Blood of the Lamb, I may come to eternal joy.

With the cincture: Gird me, O Lord, with the girdle of purity, and extinguish in me all evil desires, that the virtue of chastity may abide in me.

With the maniple: Grant, O Lord, that I may so bear the maniple of weeping and sorrow, that I may receive the reward for my labors with rejoicing.

With the stole
: Restore unto me, O Lord, the stole of immortality, which was lost through the guilt of our first parents: and, although I am unworthy to approach Your sacred Mysteries, nevertheless grant unto me eternal joy.

With the chasuble: O Lord, Who said: My yoke is easy and My burden light: grant that I may bear it well and follow after You with thanksgiving. Amen.

With the dalmatic: Lord, endow me with the garment of salvation, the vestment of joy, and with the dalmatic of justice ever encompass me.

Perspective

Questioning faith

Huw Raphael has posted on the question (and questioning) of faith in True Confessions.

There’s not a lot to say about these types of struggles. Everyone faces them in their own way, and with God’s grace (which you cannot see as being there at the time) you get through it. The best we can do is to pray for the person facing questions of faith. Huw, you have my prayers.

From my own struggles, and these are personal to me and may have no relevance to anyone else, I can offer the following:

The key question for me was whether I was able to deny Jesus. Going through my time of spiritual darkness (which lasted about 10 years) I was able to deny and reject a lot of things. However I was never able to deny or reject Jesus. I was tempted, and I thought about it, but I could never make that statement. I could not tell Him to go away.

Faith is a gift from God. Grace is offered to all and some take God up on the offer, some do not. Some get it right away, some never see it (or at least they won’t admit to it). Why one has faith, when another does not, is a mystery. It comes down to whether we can accept our place in relation to the One who is greater than us and the fulfillment of us.

Dark times are times of maturation. Huw comments on this. Do we replace faith in fantasies (Santa, the tooth fairy, the Easter Bunny) with faith in a seemingly more adult fantasy? Do we do this while never really maturing? Is faith simply an immature place to be? The dark times are meant to take us from childish (not childlike – which is good), to adolescent, to adult faith. They are a stop in the journey where we are challenged to grow —“ and growth hurts sometimes.

Scrupulosity is a pitfall we all face. I personally think that God is with us on our journey. He is not distant or removed from it. He knows us better than we know ourselves. If we become overly scrupulous in our actions, learning, practices – about needing to definitively know something – we miss the point of the journey. God put us on the journey in the first place. The point is to be embraced by a love that is at once personal and communal. If you must know faith in an absolute sense you will never get it. Faith is a knowing acceptance.

Some ‘adults’ never get beyond childish faith (I believe in God because mommy would be angry if I didn’t and I don’t want God or mommy to punish me) or adolescent faith (I believe because I want to be accepted in the group/community). That is why we need good and holy priests and deacons —“ to reach these people and bring them along. I fully believe that God has higher expectations of some of us. We have been given talents we must use for His glory, and for the building up of the Kingdom. God pushes us into the dark to test us and to allow us to come out on the other side at the next stage of maturity with our talents at the ready. Even when He puts us out, He never lets us go. He will continuously call us back. God doesn’t throw us to the wolves naked and alone. He’s with us the whole time.

For me, faith is the abiding presence of God in my life, a presence I cannot get rid of. Faith pushes me in ways I do not wish to go, and makes me wait for what I desire, all the while drawing me ever closer to my desire, to my love.

Christian Witness, Political

On the right to work

Father Martin Fox writes on Lifting up the Right to Work lightning rod…

He beings with:

Another Labor Day; another opportunity to offer some clarity about what the rights of working people and the dignity of work entail, but which our laws don’t provide for:

And ends with:

* The logic of the “coercion is for their own good” mentality is, ultimately, hostile to self-government. If workers need to be coerced, why stop there? Why shouldn’t people be coerced into religion, for their own good? Why shouldn’t they be subject to a fascist political system, “for their own good?” Where does it end.

These are some of the reasons I am for Right to Work.

I highly recommend that you check out his posting and the comments attached to it. Fr. Fox is not just blowing smoke; he has the facts to back up his assertions.

As a past victim of union coercion I am in total agreement.